Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Month: November 2022


This is the kind of morning I dream of. A fantastic new Ben Goldfarb interview about beaver magic AND a great local article about beaver sighting in Palo Alto with a great discussion of our historic papers with Rick Lanman, I just have to try and share both.

Take time to listen to the whole piece. It even praises Martinez!

The beaver is back: Pair of the semiaquatic rodents spotted in Palo Alto

More than 160 years ago, the sight and sound of beavers in local creeks was likely common, splashing their paddle-like tails with their brown bodies gliding through the water with noses just above the water line.

But now, the beaver is back. In April, the first beaver was spotted in a remote stretch of Matadero Creek. Today, there are two of the chubby herbivores. If they successfully reinhabit local creeks, the presence of these large, semiaquatic rodents could herald a return of other long-disappeared species, including salmon, endangered amphibiasemins and birds, according to scientists.

The beavers might also play crucial roles in recharging groundwater, repairing stream-channel erosion and restoring wetlands, said Dr. Rick Lanman, a Los Altos-based physician scientist, historical ecologist and president of the Institute of Historical Ecology.

For Lanman, whose groundbreaking work found that beavers were native to Santa Clara County, the journey to rediscover beavers began in 1987. His Los Altos home is located near Adobe Creek.

Oh goodness, Hi Rick! Great t0 see you back in the papers, I’ll share just one more quote and then you have to go read the whole thing yourself.

Nine years after Lanman and the Institute of Historical Ecology published their findings, in April, Palo Alto resident Bill Leikam, co-founder and board president of the Urban Wildlife Research Project, documented the first modern evidence of beavers in a remote section of Matadero Creek. Leikam, who is known for his research on the celebrated baylands gray foxes, captured images of a beaver on trail cameras after being alerted by a friend. First one, and then two beavers appeared in the ghostly black-and-white images.

The two beavers spotted this year in Palo Alto, if a compatible pair, could potentially mate and start a colony of little beavers with the potential to inhabit San Francisquito Creek and move into adjacent San Mateo County. At a certain point, in favorable habitat and with an open corridor, the population could jump, Lanman said.

“It’s gonna get real interesting. When they reach there, they’ll be able to come upstream, and that’s a big system. And it’s important because beaver provide important ecosystem services. Beaver ponds are insect cafeterias for coho salmon fry. Survival increases like 200 times when there’s a beaver pond for them. It’s a sheltered place filled with bugs,” he said, and provides shelter for steelhead trout and for Chinook salmon.

Beaver footholds across the landscape are making a huge difference. And creating a kind of scaffolding that allows support for the next beaver step across the landscape. We are building as we go.

In the city of Martinez, beavers colonized Alhambra Creek and turned the waterway from a trickle to multiple rich ponds and dams. The creek now hosts steelhead trout, and river otter, mink, green heron, hooded mergansers and tule perch, a species of fish likely not previously seen in Alhambra Creek, according to the website martinezbeavers.org.

Lanman and Leikam hope the Palo Alto beavers will also usher in an enriched ecosystem.

“It’s so exciting for me to see. Ten years later after we published these papers, finally they show up a couple of miles from my house,” Lanman said.


I think it’s high time for a little good news from Utah. Don’t you think? This from the Salt Lake Tribune by Jordan Miller.

This Utah animal is helping landowners fight wildfires, climate change and drought

Jay Wilde has worked on his Preston, Idaho, ranch just north of the Utah border for most of his life. Growing up, one of its biggest pests were beavers.

The pesky rodents muddied up irrigation ditches and blocked culverts, he said, and he wanted them gone. But after moving back in 1995, he experienced a major “paradigm shift.”

With the help of Utah State University’s Beaver Ecology and Relocation Center, he opened his property as a haven for the species in 2015. Now, the area is home to over 200 beaver dams — which have increased the ranch’s creek flows and helped a vulnerable fish species thrive.

“There’s still those folks out there that haven’t accepted the fact that we need them,” Wilde said. “But by and large, the whole attitude of beavers is beginning to change.”

Yes we do Jay. I couldn’t have said it better myself. Except I would add that iin order for US to be healthy we need healthy watersheds which means HUMANS need beavers.

Utah State’s beaver relocation program re-homes an average of 75 beavers each year, restoring ecosystems where beavers have played a crucial role for thousands of years — all with support from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the U.S. Forest Service.

Nick Bouwes, who serves as the program’s director, has studied the effects of beavers on stream restoration for over 13 years. The USU professor previously used beaver dam analogs — or man-made beaver dams — to restore salmon habitats in Oregon.

These fake dams have been a go-to for stream restoration for about a decade, Nate Norman, the center’s lead field biologist, said. They can be scaled to the size of a water body and help disperse water across floodplains, rehydrating parched areas.

Together, Bouwes and USU professor Joe Wheaton started a company to implement such dams in areas across the West before deciding in 2017 to go a step further — incorporating live beavers to the same sites.

“It started pretty small,” Norman said. “The first year we were able to trap and release five beavers, and the program has grown from there.”

Now, the program has a permanent “beaver bunkhouse” at Utah State with custom-built kennels that “mimic the comforts found in a beaver pond,” according to the center’s website.

Good. Because the university program that reintroduces beavers seems to have the motto of “If she dies, she dies…” I have a modicum of faith that you guys will get this right.

Each kennel has a concrete “pond” that slopes down into a deep-water area for cover, along with a makeshift lodge in the shallow section. The “lodge” can house several beavers, and each kennel includes a camera and a thermometer to monitor the rodents’ health.

These beaver “guests” only check-in after a landowner reports a nuisance beaver to the program. Norman then dispatches to assess the situation.

“This could be anything from a beaver that chewed on one tree one night, or it could be a colony of several beaver dams and lodges on a large ranch,” Norman said.

If Norman determines a beaver is likely settling down in the area, he’ll set out traps to catch the animal.

“They live in families, and so we tried to catch the entire family and relocate them all together,” Norman said. To make sure an entire family has been rounded up, Norman “tests” the area by breaking the beavers’ dam.

“If nobody fixes the dam, that’s usually a good indication that there’s nobody left there, we’ve got them all — because beavers really hate to have their dam broken,” he said.

Back at the bunkhouse, the beavers are quarantined for three days to make sure they don’t transmit any diseases or parasites. Volunteers clean the facility, replace their water each day and feed them one of their favorite meals: wood.

That wood typically comes from branches, which volunteers cut down from willow, cottonwood or aspen trees. Beavers also love root vegetables, Norman said, along with squash or pumpkins.

Once quarantine is over, it’s time for their relocation. First, a few man-made dams are assembled in a designated release area, to help establish a habitat. Then, the beavers are set free “to hopefully survive and thrive and save the ecosystem,” Norman said.

Sure seems like an awful lot of trouble to go to just because some landowners don’t know what’s good for them. But okay. It’s easier to move beavers than change minds. I get it. But I’m still trying.

Emily Fairfax, who serves as an assistant professor with USU’s Department of Watershed Sciences, also works as an assistant professor at California State University Channel Islands, where she leads a research group called BEAVS- which studies beavers, ecohydrology, and visual storytelling.

In Utah, Fairfax has seen evidence of beavers in some of the state’s most barren landscapes, including beaver-chewed sticks floating down the Green River, or canals beavers have dug near Desolation Canyon.

“They’re already engineering incredibly harsh environments,” Fairfax said. “So I’m optimistic that they will continue to be our climate ally, even if things get a little bit worse in the future.”

In dry climates like Utah, beavers play a crucial role in slowing water down, so precipitation has time to seep into the landscape, she said.

They also help slow down water in snowmelt-driven systems, where water can run out by June or July if it just comes “screaming through” degraded water channels.

“They’re like speed bumps for that water,” Fairfax said of beaver ponds. “And when the water is slowed down, and it gets stored, then the vegetation can keep accessing the other roots — even into July, August, September, October.”

“And that lets the vegetation stay green and lush,” she continued, “so it never really reaches that super dry, crispy fuel state that makes wildfires so intense.”

Slowing down snowmelt and giving water time to seep into the ground also helps with aquifer recharge — which Utah’s groundwater sources have been lacking.

This recharge depends on an area’s geology, Fairfax said, but research has shown that once beavers occupy a stream, there is a local rise in the water table. And if the species persists over time in that area, there can be “true aquifer recharge” — which can affect areas far beyond a beaver pond.

Okay, we’re taking these beavers to somewhere they want not to burn up and their wells not to dry. I understand that’s not what YOU personally want. TTFN. We’ll be on our way. Good luck being thirsty and flammable.

These beaver ponds double as carbon sinks, too, because the wetlands they create can help remove carbon dioxide from of the atmosphere and even slow global warming.

“In terms of adaptation, or dealing with the effects of climate change — when a riverscape is unhealthy, when it’s degraded and it’s been overly modified by people, it cannot resist any disturbances,” Fairfax said. “A drought, a flood, a fire — any of those that come through is just going to make that system even more unhealthy.”

But when beavers are in an area, they can nudge a riverscape back toward restoration, she said.

“Then when you have a disturbance… the river just handles it like it’s meant to do,” she said, “because it’s been part of this planet for millions and millions and millions of years, and it should be able to persist through natural disturbances.”

Beavers get over it. They help YOU get over it. It’s what they do.

Wilde has seen the talents of beavers firsthand. The Beaver Relocation Center established a few man-made dams on the Idaho rancher’s property before relocating five beavers there in 2015, and Wilde credits those dams to enticing the animals to stay in the area.

That’s because beavers need deep water, Wilde said — their entire defense mechanism when evading predators relies on hiding in it.

“So we just added some security to them long enough so they could get their own dams and complexes put together,” he said, “and away they went.”

Wilde’s ranch is located along Birch Creek, which is a tributary of the Bear River. The creek dries up each year, and ever since he moved back in the 1990s, he’s noted the exact date that the water has disappeared annually.

That’s why he knows that since the beavers made a home at his ranch, the creek has seen between 40-50 additional days of water flow.

This year, the creek has continued to flow for 75 more days, Wilde said.

“They’re pretty reclusive, and you don’t see a lot of them,” Wilde said. “But usually, along toward dusk in the evenings, they’ll come out and be swimming around, and working on those on those dams.”

The beavers’ work has allowed other wildlife in the area to thrive, he said. In 2001 and 2012, for instance, the Forest Service recorded fewer than five Bonneville cutthroat trout per 100 meters on Birch Creek.

But in 2019, after the beavers were established, the Forest Service recorded about 70 of the threatened fish per 100 meters.

“My whole goal was to try to get the stream to flow,” Wilde said. “But you know, the effect that it’s had on those fish? That’s just been phenomenal.”

Wilde’s ranch has received nine relocated beavers over the years — all for free. Interested landowners can get involved by contacting their local DWR office, or the ecology center directly.

“They are the most calm animal. They are chill,“ Norman said. “They’re an amazing little rodent.”

How true. What a FANTASTIC article Jordan Miller has written. Spoken like a true believer who actually did her homework. There’s a reason why Utah is neck and neck with Washington for being the smartest  beaver state. I am always happy to be reminded of why.


I am old. The Martinez Beaver story is old. The entire drama unfolded more than 15 years ago. There have been three presidents since them. Change takes a long time coming. And as hard as it was we got the easy shift. Things were harder when Sherri Tippie was a twenty something and Enos Mills was saying ‘beavers matter’ and harder still when Grey Owl was saying stop trapping beavers.

Martinez has a solid place in the beaver story because there was soo much public interest it forced our city to hire the only famous beaver installer at the time who happened to live in Vermont. He made sure that what he installed worked in our creek which was unheard of in the west. Certainly in California. Since he invented the technology we became associated with the buzz of his invention.

You probably know the legacy. Long before Martinez Skip Lisle trained Mike Callahan. Who started a voluneer group to install flow devices then his own business then the beaver institute. Which is now famous for training professionals all across the nation.

It is all full circle now.

Skip Lisle: There’s enormous potential for beavers and flow devices

This commentary is by Skip Lisle, a resident of Grafton, a wildlife biologist and president of Beaver Deceivers LLC.

By some miracle, we have an animal called a beaver that builds, maintains and improves rich wetlands. However, damming behavior also creates challenging and sometimes expensive beaver-human conflicts.

Partly because of their rarity, which has been increased greatly by development, wetlands like those that beavers create have enormous value. They are critical habitat for thousands of species, including numerous game animals. They have hydrological functions such as water purification, sequestration of fine sediments and pollutants, groundwater recharge, and water storage (flood abatement). Beautiful and teeming with life, they also represent aesthetic or spiritual wealth. 

As an example of the importance of wetlands, the federal government sometimes pays hundreds of thousands of dollars per acre for manmade versions that are much less valuable and natural than those created by beavers.

Give that man a pen more often. Skip has been telling this story for a long, long time. To many different kinds of people motivated by many different kinds of things.

Beavers are mostly restricted to a tiny section of the landscape: low-gradient areas on small streams. In this beaver-damming habitat, they are able to create larger wetlands where their dams can survive high-water events. 

This is where most of the beaver-human conflicts occur, particularly when high-value properties like roads abut or intersect these zones. Tiny, easy-to-clog holes in large manmade dams (roads), culverts are the biggest problem of all. They are beaver magnets. 

Beavers are territorial. They typically do not tolerate the presence of unrelated beavers. Therefore, the number of beavers present in a territory, or at a given conflict point, might range from one to 10  with an average, perhaps, of three or four. Because of deaths from starvation, disease and predation (e.g., humans, motor vehicles, coyotes and bears), births and dispersal, this number is constantly changing.

When dispersing, they search for beaver-free zones, like conflict points where a kill-defense has been employed (double magnet). At a given point, therefore, overpopulation is never the problem, but underpopulation can be.

A little population management of adult beavers cannot eliminate a conflict. It takes only one non-kit beaver one night to clog a culvert. However, when all the adults are eliminated, any kits present will starve. Consequently, a little killing often leads to a lot of slow, wasteful and unconscionable dying.

So humans make the most inviting places for beavers to build a dam AND then humans kill off their competition so they can start fresh and plant nice trees for them to eat. We should never be surprised when a beaver disperser gets our party invitation.

To effectively protect a culvert by lethal means requires permanent extirpation. Just as the presence of beavers frequently leads to ecological miracles, their forced absence often has the opposite effect: Sterilization.

Loss of birds. Loss of fish. Loss of frogs. Loss of water.

A kill-defense at a given conflict point guarantees that the problem will persist in expensive, never-ending cycles. In addition, “killing” ensures that none of the wetland values that beavers symbolize will ever persist (dams decay in their absence) or develop in the general area of any conflict point.

On a broader scale, given the inordinate value of beavers, no responsible governing agency would ever allow the overall beaver population to become low. With concern for protecting the environment growing among the general populace, it may not be politically possible, either. Therefore, we can never rely on killing, either locally or regionally, to solve the conflict.

Hmm. Since I don’t know of any state in the country that monitors its beaver population I’m not sure  they would ever know when it got “LOW”.

Fortunately, there is a remedy: High-quality flow devices. These essentially control damming behavior by sneaking water away from beavers.

They are complicated engineering feats, and normally can be built successfully only by skilled specialists. When this is not the case, and flow devices have little design or structural integrity, they invariably fail. This often leads to a loss of confidence by the public in the general concept and to a doubling-down on killing.

At many places in New England and elsewhere over the last 25 years, high-quality flow devices have repeatedly proven themselves. They have saved society millions of dollars while indirectly creating thousands of acres of wetlands. High-quality flow devices can solve the problem at almost any site, generally need little maintenance, last for decades, rarely require killing, and pay for themselves many times over again. They are great investments.

Because of the limited geographical nature of the conflict, in a few weeks one competent builder with hand tools can eliminate the problem in any given town for decades. It’s thus easy to imagine beaver-proofing a small state like Vermont.

There is a tension in the world between saying ‘these problems are solvable’ and ‘any fool with a hammer and a pair of waders can solve them’. Bad flow devices are bad for beavers because they result in trapping and advertise that flow devices don’t work. But rare and expensive flow devices are also bad for beavers because they mean well-intenioned paces can’t afford them or install them and beavers die.

It’s an age-old  conundrum we’re getting a little better at solving.

The implementation of high-quality flow devices — mostly by contractors, and largely at the Penobscot Indian Nation in Maine and several New England states — has led the world. The two leading flow device companies are Beaver Deceivers LLC (mine, from Vermont) and Beaver Solutions LLC (Massachusetts). Both companies also offer presentations and workshops, as does a nonprofit, the Beaver Institute (Massachusetts).

Their willingness to share their knowledge represents an opportunity for government managers and budding entrepreneurs, among others.

Because of a past absence of high-quality flow devices and their builders, killing has long been a necessity to protect the infrastructure. Even today, it’s sometimes an important short-term solution. Along with predators, we should thank shooters, trappers and state wildlife managers for helping with this prior defense.

But beavers can’t be an eternal enemy. It is long overdue for society to begin to make a serious transition toward a more reliable, long-lasting, economical and ecologically friendly approach.


That’s what I call a closing argument.


Wow this was quite an impressive headline from our favorite beaver state. The very idea that Fish and Wildlife took an actual poll of attitudes to find out how their actions are being viewed by the public is pretty startling. When is California doing this? I’d like to know.

Poll Shows Gulf Between Washington Voters and State Fish and Wildlife Management

SEATTLE, WA, UNITED STATES, November 1, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ — A new poll commissioned by Washington Wildlife First reveals that Washington voters do not support many of the policies of the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, and that they overwhelmingly favor a more inclusive Department that represents all the people of the state.

We found that the Washington public opposes many of the Departments policies, particularly its management of large carnivores, says Samantha Bruegger, executive director of Washington Wildlife First, the organization that commissioned the poll. This poll demonstrates how out of touch the Department has become with the interests and values of Washingtonians.

For example, the poll found that 80% of Washington voters oppose spring bear hunting, while only 8% support it. The result was similar in households with active hunters, with 69% of those respondents opposing the spring bear hunt. It was also consistent in most areas of the state, with 81% opposing spring bear hunting in King County compared to 77% in eastern Washington.

You know my next question of course. As public reporting on beavers is changing how are are feelings about depredation changing as well? Maybe California isn’t so happy with problems that never get solved. I had to go looking for the real poll. Fortunately it’s all online.

Public Policy Polling®3020 Highwoods Blvd.Raleigh, NC 27604

713 voters, more than half reached by text. That’s not very onerous. There are early 8 million folks polling 3500 people wouldn’t be impossible. They do it all the time for candidates and voting measures. Why not for beavers?

I don’t know about you but if I were Jay Ensley looking to attract people to my state this would be a billboard at the state lines, My neice lives in Washington. Maybe I should migrate?

I’m very pragmatic in my day dreams. I know people answer what they want to sound like rather than how they would really feel if a beaver was flooding their basement but honestly, I just want to velcro Chuck Bonham to a comfortable chair and make him read that over and over. Would that be okay?

Do you know what a push-poll is? It’s a poll where the cards are already stacked. It’s seeming to ask you a question while in reality it’s really telling you something that will influence your answer. It’s like when you are baby sitting and ask your little sister whether she wants to go out for icky old pizza in a cold noisy market or would rather stay home by the fire and make a pillow fort while your wonderful boyfriend comes over and makes his special spaghetti.

The way you ask the question determines the answer. Let’s just say I like that question.

I’m thinking we should find the 26% of people who voted for Trump and think that beavers are good for the environment AND the 15% who voted for Biden and think beavers are nuisances and we should have a little beer and pizza night presentation. They seem like our target persuadable audience.

You in? Let’s give the last words back to Sandra:

I hope the Governor takes note of how much Washingtonians care about these issues, even though institutional barriers have made it difficult for people who do not hunt or fish to have a voice, Davis says. As the state faces the dual crises of climate change and global biodiversity loss, it is time to abandon the model of a game department that exists to serve hunters and realize that we all have a stake in the health of our fish and wildlife populations, and we all should have a voice.


You can literally not imagine how many links I restored yesterday if you go clicking through the menu bar above us. Changing each individual address from martinbeavers.org/wordpress/whatever to martinezbeavers.org/whatever without the wordpress. Maybe 400? Maybe a thousand? A good webmaster should be checking links every week just to make sure they’re still active but I am not that by a long shot. Anyway they are MOSTLY finished now I think except for the podcast episodes which will be harder to do.
Hurray?

This dropped yesterday and I was very happy with it. I think you will be too.

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!