When it comes to beaver the F words are fur and feelings.
I try to stay away from them generally. We’ll talk more about that later but first we have some delightful kid interviews about beavers. Isn’t that fun? From Wyoming all about beavers. It’s like they knew I was coming. This is the kind of recording I could listen too all day.
Episode 4: Why Are Beavers And Mountain Men Linked In History?
Madison Burckhardt and Breann Berg wanted to find out more about why they think Wyoming is wonderful. Madison a nine-year-old from Cody, Wyoming is interested in beavers and interviewed biologist, Jerry Altermatt about how beavers influence the environment and why they sometimes have to be moved. By the end, she confirmed why she thought beavers were awesome and their influences on waterways and meadows. Breann, a ten-year-old from Rawlins, Wyoming became interested in mountain men while learning about them at school and wanted to know more. In the second half of the episode, Breann interviews Clay Landry, fur trade historian, to discuss her favorite mountain man, John Colter, and his adventures in the Yellowstone region.
Madison Burckhardt
Madison is a ten-year-old native of Cody Wyoming. Madison is a fantastic artist who loves wildlife, nature, and horses. Madison’s love for beavers began when she had the opportunity to help a Wyoming Game and Fish Department biologist trap, care for and relocate a family of beavers.
Jerry Altermatt
is a Terrestrial Habitat Biologist for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department in Cody, Wyoming. He has been working to enhance habitat for wildlife in the Cody Region since 1992.
Not bad answers or questions from Wyoming, a state that isn’t always very patient with beavers. I enjoyed the first interview more than the second, but I guess it’s fun to hear a little about trappers worrying that everyone would think they were insane.
Yesterday this most amusing letter was published in Havre Montana, which of course you know I had to respond to. I feel very restrained that I said nothing about his having a ridiculous name in addition to his ridiculous positions.
Letter to the Editor – Some questions about Beaver Deceivers
I have been following the debate over the beaver situation in our Hill County Beaver Creek Park. We are losing a tremendous amount of trees and access to the creek itself by a common rodent. The beaver. Now that the anti-trapping people and other humane special interest groups have been called to graciously help solve our problem there have been many questions left unanswered.
Okay. Let’s stop right there and get out our fainting couches. There is going to be some shocking revelations coming, I just know it. Call me suspicious but I don’t get the feeling he’s asking questions because he wants an answer so much as he wants to hear the sound of his fingers typing.
1. How much will these Beaver Deceivers, pond levelers, cost? (I was told it was $12-15,000 each.
Ha! Are they really made out of solid gold? Inquiring minds are demanding answers.
2. What is the effective range of a Beaver Deceiver and how many will it take to cover the trouble area?
Oh a genuine question! I’m sure you didn’t mean it, I’ll allow.
3. Who is going to pay the price of these magical beaver foolers. This park belongs to Hill County. So, I think you know.
That’s more like it. “Magical Beaver Foolers”. Now that’s some good snark out of Montana. I never would have guessed you could snark as well as city folk. Now if my name were “Dibblee” I would avoid being too snotty but I don’t know very many people in Havre. Maybe that’s the most dignified name around. Maybe there’s a Dibblee courthouse and a Dibblee post office and a long pedigree making it the most respected name in town. What do I know?
4. Whose responsibility will it be to maintain “magical” devices?
Magical again. I expect less redundancy with my snark Jeff.
I will not take up any of your valuable time on the history and chronological factual information of the impact trapping has been for our state. I will say that this furbearing game animal can be properly maintained by conventional trapping methods.
Is trapping a painful, horrid death as claimed by Ms. York and her side kick, Ms. Braaten? I can’t say. I have never talked to a beaver to ask them how they feel about trappers.
Good lord. I can’t even. The problem with anti trap folks is that they trigger the anti compassion folks. I tell you what. Let’s not talk about beaver discomfort at ALL. Let’s just talk about selfish gain. The park gets more wildlife to shoot, more fish to trap and more water to swim in IF it keeps beavers. Is saves money by not having to pay trappers year after year and the place is big enough that you can afford to pick some small creek or stream to test it out. Does that sound reasonable?
Please do not let this Trap Free Montana organization fool you.
It’s not just about trapping. They want to take your hunting and fishing privileges away as well.
Think about this. If you have a piece of ground that deer and elk are raising havoc on, should the fish and game set up “deceivers” or issue extra “B” tags or damage hunt permits?
In conclusion I would like anyone interested in learning more about “your” park, to please attend the next meeting when announced.
Jeff C. Dibblee
Hill County voter, taxpayer, conservationist
I don’t believe their is an “Elk deceiver” but I could be wrong. I snooped around the internet and found another letter from Jeff about the importance of unions which he signed with ‘retired rail union man”. Okay. Someone buy him a copy of Lewis Morgan the American beaver and his works. I think Jeff needs a beer and a long chat with someone like Jerry Altermatt or Torrey Ritter and what ever you do don’t mention fur or feelings.
This is winnable, Montana. Just keep your eyes on the prize,
