Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Month: July 2021


A while ago I wrote about the Virginia writer who noticed beavers on his land, thought briefly about their friend’s comment on their value and ended up killing them anyway. Now that same writer has had a longer conversation with his friend and is really starting to think, I believe these are the conversations that everyone who loves the land needs to be having, and it makes me enormously happy to read. Maybe I’ll even send them a copy of Ben’s book.

Farmer Bill Fletcher weighs in

Aerial image of the Rappahannock river above Fredericksburg, VA

A while back, I met with my friend, Bill Fletcher, to have a bite and pick up where we had left off so many years earlier. Listening to him talk about water as Rappahannock’s most precious asset, I was reminded that change happens when need and experienced-based insight converge. What follows is Bill’s thinking about what we can do next to protect what we all cherish about Rappahannock:

Tommy Bruce: When did your family come to settle in Rappahannock?

Bill Fletcher: My family has been here since the 1740’s. I remember my father telling me that generations back, our forebears came up from the Tidewater area in the summertime to get away from the malaria and mosquitoes. Over time, summer houses became family homes for the family.

Back then there were no real roads and even fewer bridges. Only ferries and low water crossings. My father said that the rivers were navigable and barges transported people and material up from Fredericksburg. In my own time I remember canoeing with my father on the Thornton River on a regular basis. That’s not possible today.

Okay now THAT’S what I would call an old-timer. Family lived in the area since 1740. I sense that in every possible other way Bill and I might hate eachother. But in this are we are of like minds. Wonderful.

Tommy Bruce: Water is a theme in your life. Is it one for Rappahannock?

Bill Fletcher: I’ve always been a bit fascinated with water. When I was 7 or 8 years old, I’d sneak out of the house and go down to one of the little streams on the property and try to build dams out of sticks, reeds and grasses. I’d wait to see how long they lasted. Not very long of course. Later in the 1980’s, a geologist told us the water levels in the 1700’s was maybe two or three feet higher on the Thornton River. That made me curious about where all the water had gone. Since then, I’ve talked to various experts.

Tommy Bruce: So, what is the situation today?

Bill Fletcher: Well, I can tell you what is happening on my land. The old artesian well, down at what we call the Jail House, was drilled in 1980, and is now down 100 feet. We have had to dig additional wells to make do on the property. The challenge these days is… we need to retain water on the land for the good of our lands, but also to build up our aquifers. I’ve been trying to find out the depth of our wells relative sea level. Unfortunately, I haven’t found any records tracking the replacement of wells and why it’s happening. 

Let’s talk about your wells. Let’s talk about your water. Let’s talk.

Tommy Bruce: What should we do about it?

Bill Fletcher: Water is life. It is the most important thing you have in life. We can’t just sit by and watch our lands dry up. We need to envision a different future for Rappahannock County. Don’t get me wrong, I’m an old timer and I believe in the old time ways. But, we’ve got to change with the times and learn from what some of our neighbors are doing. This is just my personal opinion.

Tommy Bruce: What are you thinking?

Bill Fletcher: Rappahannock is about water. So, we need to think about ways to slow down the flow of water away from our county. If the water stays longer on our lands, it’s good for the soil, vegetation, the wildlife and will help reverse the very real depletion or our aquifers. If we do nothing, we’re going to be the first ones to dry up.

Tommy Bruce: What do you mean, “be the first”. Who else would be affected?

Bill Fletcher: We are the headwaters for everything east of us, downstream all the way to the Bay. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation also tells us our waters help carry the silt and pollutants that are now affecting the health of the Bay. So, we need our aquifers to remain plentiful and flowing at a more appropriate rate. That’s where my idea about bringing back beaver dams and what they call Beaver Dam Analogs (BDAs). This is where Rappahannock could actually set itself apart and be more beneficial to our citizens, our state and our nation.

Oh Bill. I’m liking where the water and the Chesapeake is taking you. Stay in that stream and lets flow together.

Tommy Bruce: So, how can BDAs help landowners in Rappahannock?

Bill Fletcher: I learned that there are four things beaver dams and the analogs can do for us. First, they slow the flow of water and mitigate flooding damages. They filter sediment which cleans the soil and allows the water to sink in to replenish the water table. They help the wildlife habitat. Fourth, dams help increase vegetation. Also, keep in mind what they call pollutants we call fertilizers. When the ponds overflow, the sediment –to which the pollutants are attached- is then deposited on the ground thereby improving it.

Tommy Bruce:  But I seem to remember you liked to blow up beaver dams?

Bill Fletcher: Let me tell you a story. When I was 10 years old, the beavers would build dams on the best crop land we had at Montpelier. When the flooding got to a certain level, my father would tell Ollie Dodson to go down and blow them up and I would go with him. It was a tremendous amount of fun. I loved loud noises. All these years later, I took a friend of mine, who happens to be an avid hunter, down to these same fields where beavers had again been hard at work. The place was transformed and wildlife has come back. We saw a big brunch of turkeys in the field and then 30 feet away, we came upon 20 or so deer and then we drove a little further and a bunch of ducks came up on the pond as geese flew off another pond. I realized this place had become excellent hunting grounds. Now, I rent land on Thornton Hill and Miller farm for hunting and get more money that way than I did from using or renting it for cattle grazing. 

Sure it’s fun to blow things up when you’re 10, but it’s also damn fun to see the wildlife come back  to an area and realize you’re sitting on a hunting gold mine. Let the rodent do the work. Let beavers be beavers.

Tommy Bruce: When did you really start to think differently about all of this?

Bill Fletcher: My “aha moment” came last year when I went to see my daughter who lives on the Miller farm. We had put up a dam to create a small one acre pond. The beavers had gotten into it and repaired the pond to a certain extent, and expanded it by three or four times. I thought it was really pretty and might be good for both farming and the natural habitat. But, then my daughter pointed out that a spring she hadn’t seen before had come back. That was my “aha moment”. From that moment on, I started to explore my own ideas about what to do to slow down the flow of water away from Rappahannock. I talked to a lot of people. I met with Amy Johnson from the Smithsonian Institution who told me about all the rare orchids and birds we had. Together we’d compare notes with other land owners. I reached out to Jim Abdo to talk through my evolving thought process. He introduce me to Bill  Somerlot who is an expert in the field and has helped me through the whole process of discovery. Eventually I met with John Odenkirk, an expert with fisheries and a personal friend, who lives in the County. That’s when a lot of this really started to come together for me. I then met with Bryan Hofmann, Deputy Director with Friends of the Rappahannock, who confirmed that, yes, beavers retain water on the land, something we really need to do in Rappahannock. 

It’s wonderful that not I don’t recognize a single name he mentions but I know exactly what they talked about. And I talk about it all the time.

Tommy Bruce: Do you have a specific proposal you want people to think about:

Bill Fletcher: In a nutshell, I think we should get some grants together to plan how to bring the beaver back and deploy Beaver Dam Analogs (BDA’s) or leaky weirs to slow the flow away from our lands. Hopefully, we’d create the conditions for nature to do its thing. 

Tommy Bruce: What would you like to see the state of Virginia do?

Bill Fletcher: Well, Virginia has a program, and a good one I’m sure, to fence the streams and rivers, but I don’t think fences alone will replenish our aquifers or stope the erosion down into the Bay. The State should get involved in a BDA program, and provide economic incentives to farmers who help keep and clean the water in Rappahannock. Maybe, even make water conservation a condition of land use. We also need some help with record keeping. For instance, the reports to the county on average rainfall differ by a lot. Without adequate record keeping there can’t be a reliable determination of what’s really going on.

Okay, the purists in me says you don’t need BDAs you just need to stop blowing up B’s. But I appreciate so much your peering into the light and I can understand why it’s valuable to exercise a little more control over where the B’s make themselves at home.

Tommy Bruce: At heart you are a farmer. What are the challenges for farmers in Rappahannock? What else should they consider doing with their land?

Bill Fletcher: I love the land almost as much as I love my children, but, the cost of doing business keeps going up. We don’t have Fauquier loam in Rappahannock and some of our lands have been polluted by heavy metals from coal fired plants. So, we have our challenges. We have no prime agricultural land. Besides, the cost of farming keeps rising along with the taxes that have tripled at least since the 1970’s. Actually the tax baseline is higher than the agricultural value of much of our land. We have tried everything. We tried crop land, beans, corn, wheat, oats, rye, and yeah it is crazy. 

I also believe everybody should be self-sufficient. I mean, if the world goes to hell, I keep enough food and fuel and generators to run my farm for six months. It is expensive but I don’t trust the government. Everything’s a vote away from going to hell. 

I’d love nothing more than to keep Rappahannock pristine and beautiful and lush. But, we’ve got all kinds of pressure now on us. I think farmers should be able to look at other uses, including solar, to keep the land as open as it is today while still making a living. Personally, I want a solar field on my farm to run my farm efficiently, energy-wise. That being said, I’m not an expert but it makes sense to look into these ideas. I think Rappahannock needs to be open to this kind of thinking.

What’s your mailing address? I think I’m sending you a book today. Keep an eye on the mailbox.

Tommy Bruce: Will it be a challenge to bring along people in the County?

Bill Fletcher: Well, I just say use your common sense. Do your own reading and check out the research being done in the US. I’d start with “Beaver dam analogues drive heterogeneous groundwater–surface water interactions” from the journal Hydrologic Processes. That piece told me a lot. Not so long ago, I didn’t know about beaver dam analogs or even the leaky weirs they’ve been using for a number of year in England and Australia. And, water seemed to be plentiful. But, all that has changed, and we need to seize the opportunity to lead the way.

Tommy Bruce: Any last thought?

Bill Fletcher: We could be the greenest county, we could have the healthiest environment, and Rappahannock could be a tremendous asset. But, our land needs to be healthy with plenty of water for farming to flourish and preserve the viewsheds we all care about. It’s a trickle down economy… just like water. If all our water goes away then all our money will go away. We’ve got to do something to stop that and bring Rappahannock back. You know me, I don’t want to change anything, but like the rest of us, I’ve got to survive.  And, if the farms can’t survive, Rappahannock ,as we know it, won’t survive. 

And that’s it. If the water doesn’t survive the people won’t survive. And Beavers will help you keep water on the land. And all you gotta do is stop blowing them up. That seems a fair trade doesn’t it?

When the old timers come to Beavers, I get very very happy.


Did you know there are lobbyists in Sacramento that only represent nonprofits? I honestly did not, but there a ton of slippery surfaces to navigate in getting a bill affecting wildlife/water or wilderness through the finish line. Sometimes you need someone on the front lines to shepherd, hound, coax and shame a bill into law.

Meet Jennifer Fearing.

Recently named the Sacramento Advocate for the association of NonProfits, Jennifer has represented the Humane Society for years and is a truly fearless advocate for animal rights. Her current client list includes such heavy hitters as the the Ocean Society, the San Francisco SPCA, the San Diego Humane Society, California Association for Museums, NPS, The Mountain Lion Foundation and ohh look she also represents the CDFW wardens managers and supervisors association. Fancy that.

Recently when the The California Ecosystems Protection Act (A.B. 1788)  was passed to outlaw the dangerous anticoagulents rat poisons that kill birds and wildlife, Jennifer’s services were paid for by ALDF to  make sure the deal closed this time. Our good friend Lisa Owens Viani of RATS has been hammering at this for ages, but she freely admits it made a difference to have someone hired to finish the job.

Maybe beavers need a lobbyist?

Here she is recently on Capitol Weekly podcast. When I was asking wise friends who might really help change California Policy, heavy hitter water guru Felica Marus described her as “Awesome: Stategic, Grounded and Effective“. I think if you listen to this interview you might see why.

The video is footage of her efforts getting Nonprofit Day successfully passed through the California legislature. It sure would be nice to see beaver legislation passed that requires CDFW to oh I don’t know, actually count the number of beaver around before they allow them to be trapped, or monitor whether its a salmon stream BEFORE they issue the permit, or even evaluate whether there have been drought conditions or fire in the last five years in the are to see if we can really do without the water-savers in question.

I tend to dream big. And this is getting to be a whopper.

[wonderplugin_video iframe=”https://youtu.be/UNFY8OhHifc” lightbox=0 lightboxsize=1 lightboxwidth=960 lightboxheight=540 autoopen=0 autoopendelay=0 autoclose=0 lightboxtitle=”” lightboxgroup=”” lightboxshownavigation=0 showimage=”” lightboxoptions=”” videowidth=600 videoheight=400 keepaspectratio=1 autoplay=0 loop=0 videocss=”position:relative;display:block;background-color:#000;overflow:hidden;max-width:100%;margin:0 auto;” playbutton=”https://www.martinezbeavers.org/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wonderplugin-video-embed/engine/playvideo-64-64-0.png”]


Time for another fun interview, this time from Emily Faifax at KCRW in Santa Monica. I knew the Doty story would get a bunch of eyes. With host Madeleine Brand.

Beavers to prevent wildfires? Conservationists are enlisting the help of these buck-toothed rodents

As California continues to grapple with a mega-drought and wildfires, we’re trying to do whatever we can to help our parched landscapes and abate that wildfire threat. But the process can be costly and time-consuming. 

A few weeks ago, the Sacramento Bee reported on a floodplain in Placer County. During California’s last big drought in 2014, ecologists wanted to restore the dry, barren grassland. It would’ve taken 10 years and cost as much as $2 million. But there was another option: beavers. 

Conservationists turned the buck-toothed, oversized rodents loose and got out of their way. And unlike every other contractor on the planet, they finished under budget and ahead of schedule.


Suzanne Fouty is the retired Forest Service Hydrologist whose 2003 dissertation “Current and historic stream channel response to changes in cattle and elk grazing pressure and beaver activity”  drew the attention of Mary O’brien of the Grand Canyon Land Trust and became the strong soil beneath so much beaver understanding ever since. Her teachings persuaded the young Jeff Baldwin who went on to host the California Beaver Summit at Sonoma State and she laid the foundation for Ben Goldfarb’s incredible book that has inspired every single person who touched it, Suzanne shaped the forest service attitudes towards beaver contribution for many years, and believe me when I say, it wasn’t always easy.

During her ‘time on the squad” she was a patient, measured voice for beavers, wolves and streams. And when I met her I misunderstood how hard she was working to stay below the water line. Working for a huge federal agency takes stamina and restraint. When she retired I started to hear a new energy in her voice, a little like we heard from Obama after he stopped being president. She got bolder and more forceful on behalf of beavers and streams, and now that ODFW has refused to protect beavers even though they know it’s the right thing to do, she has become…

well…kinda like me.

This is the most unfettered, bold and direct interview I have ever heard her give. I am reminded of the quote by Glenda Jackson, “I look Forward to growing old, wise and audacious.”

Beaver Field Trip Along the North Fork Burnt River

A couple months ago we talked with Suzanne Fouty, a hydrologist who worked for Wallowa-Whitman National Forest in eastern Oregon as a water resource and soils specialist. One of her specialties is beaver and at that time she was working with a group trying to get legislation passed to ban the trapping of beaver on public lands in Oregon. That bill never made it out of committee but the importance of protecting beaver and the important role they play in creating diverse, fire resistant and climate friendly landscapes has not lessened.

On the second day of summer I recorded a field interview along the North Fork Burnt River, 45 miles west of Baker City, Oregon, with Suzanne, and on our hike she showed me several beaver dams and the amazing impact they have on the landscape. On this episode of Locus Focus you get to join on us on that hike.

Something tells me you’re going to enjoy this.


Did you hear the deftly wielded light saber noises coming from the Pacific North West yesterday? It was the rock-em sock-em take-no-prisoners beaver column in Oregon Live yesterday by Robert L. Beschta, the professor Emeritus at OSU. Let me show you what I mean.

Opinion: Oregon’s beavers – our ‘ecological engineers’ – need our help

In June 2020, a citizen’s group formally requested that Oregon’s Fish and Wildlife Commission stop beaver trapping/hunting on all federally managed lands, such as on national forests, Bureau of Land Management lands, wildlife refuges, national parks, and others. In support of that request, a letter signed by nearly 40 Oregon researchers, educators, and resource practitioners was provided to the commission — a letter that briefly summarized some of the wide array of ecological benefits beavers can deliver.

Nevertheless, the commission refused to take a vote, and trapping and hunting continues.

Okay, First we asked NICE. And you said pooh pooh no can do. So now we’re going in full bore.

One might ask, why should beavers now be afforded increased protection? Perhaps the simple answer is “new science.” During the last quarter century, the ecological importance of beavers has been increasingly studied and the results have been no less than astounding.

Beavers build dams to create ponds that in turn serve as centralized locations for caching food supplies and help shield them from natural predators. As “ecological engineers,” beavers and their dams generate a multitude of important ecosystem benefits, including creating ponds and wetlands and natural fire breaks, storing groundwater, trapping sediment, keeping wet meadows wet, increasing the diversity of plant communities and augmenting carbon sequestration. These changes have profound positive effects for maintaining stream flows and riparian plant communities during periods of increasing drought. Additionally, they help meet the habitat needs for numerous species of Oregon fish and wildlife, from salmon to birds to bears to elk, as well as the needs of downstream water users.

Beavers could make things better. But youuuuuuuuuu didn’t want that did you? You wanted to be parched and burned and stripped of salmon so you could be free to pursue your beloved trapping.

In the face of ongoing climate change, water shortages, increased fire frequency, drying of streams, and increased threats to fish and wildlife species, providing greater protection of beavers on federally managed lands should be a no-brainer for the state of Oregon. The commission needs to institute a moratorium on the hunting and trapping of beavers on these lands prior to the start of the November 15 season. The moratorium should remain in effect until the formal process of making more permanent changes in trapping and hunting rules can be completed.

I think I know what’s happening here. It’s not that trappers are so special or that ODFW loves them soo darn much. It’s that the handful of trappers keep beavers ‘out of the way’, Taking care of a pesky depredation problem for free and with no permitting needed. Trappers are being USED to clear the way for regular maintenance. Get rid of the beavers or their children so park officials never have to problem solve. The same way maga voters were being “USED” to threaten democracy and create enough bruhaha that the Trump coffers stay fully funded.

The time is long overdue for Oregon’s Department of Fish and Wildlife to fully implement its mission statement — “to protect and enhance Oregon’s fish and wildlife and their habitats for the use and enjoyment by present and future generations.” Oregon streams, deep in a drought and the wildfire season, need water. As a keystone species, beavers can help us in these trying times but only if we protect them.

BAM! SMASH! PEW PEW PEW! You tell ’em Robert! Nicely laid out.

Beschta, who has a doctorate in watershed management, is emeritus professor of forest ecosystems and society at Oregon State University. He lives in Corvallis.

Don’t say I never gave you anything. Be nice and tomorrow I’ll take you on a beaver field trip with Suzanne Fouty!

[wonderplugin_video iframe=”https://youtu.be/8kpHK4YIwY4″ lightbox=0 lightboxsize=1 lightboxwidth=960 lightboxheight=540 autoopen=0 autoopendelay=0 autoclose=0 lightboxtitle=”” lightboxgroup=”” lightboxshownavigation=0 showimage=”” lightboxoptions=”” videowidth=600 videoheight=400 keepaspectratio=1 autoplay=0 loop=0 videocss=”position:relative;display:block;background-color:#000;overflow:hidden;max-width:100%;margin:0 auto;” playbutton=”https://www.martinezbeavers.org/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wonderplugin-video-embed/engine/playvideo-64-64-0.png”]

 

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!