There is lots in this article I disagree with, but the line in the header is true. Just not in the way they mean it.
Beavers expanding north bring damming consequences for Inuit and wildlife
Eddie Kumarluk remembers a time when thousands of Arctic char swam in the Pamiullujusiup Lake near Umiujaq, Que. In the 1970s, there was a local who set up his nets in the winter, recalled Kumarluk, manager of the hunting, fishing and trapping association of the community in Quebec’s northern Nunavik region.
“He used to catch nothing but Arctic char,” said Kumarluk. “It’s one of our main foods that we like so much, and they have been in decline in recent years. We have hardly caught any.” What he described as a once plentiful area for fishers is no more. Newly arrived beavers are to blame.
The buck-toothed rodents have been expanding north over the past few decades — now found in parts of Nunavik, past the treeline. Experts say they are travelling out of survival instincts, but the move has a cost on wildlife and the traditional ways of life for Inuit.
So Artic char is a circumpolar fish salmonid that lives in the very very cold waters that other fish can’t tolerate. They are like steelhead in that they can be landlocked or navigate to sea and back again. Those darn beavers with their icky dams ruining things for Artic Char. The declining numbers MUST be because of the spread of beavers north right? I mean it’s not like there are regular populations of Char in the lower parts of Alaska or down in Canada right?
Locals began noticing the encroaching animals as early as the 1970s and ’80s, says Kumarluk.
Ten to 15 years ago, they started finding beaver dams built along the lakes. From there, they realized the extent of the damage caused by the semiaquatic animals — and the need to study their impact on the northern environment.
Kumarluk says it’s the “architecture” of the dam — built as a shelter for young beavers — that poses a problem to Arctic char specifically.
“They’re not as strong as salmon. Salmon can jump over a beaver dam … but Arctic [char] are weaker,” said Kumarluk, adding that the beavers’ presence has become a concern for the community.
“We don’t know how many rivers they have blocked or dammed and we have so much work ahead of us,” said Kumarluk. “We’re doing what we can.”
Part of the effort has been on securing funding to dismantle the dams to restore proper water flow to the lakes.
The mind literally reels. The jaw literally drops. First of all. BEAVERS DON’T LIVE IN THE DAM. Second of all just because two things appear to happen at the same time doesn’t mean that one caused the other. And third of all just because you have native ancestry doesn’t mean you are the repository of all tribal knowledge. I have tin mining ancestry going back many generations, for example, it doesn’t I have the faintest idea where you should dig for anything.
You had the same luck we all did. You and your father grew up in a world without beavers. Because every man and his cousin already trapped them out. Now that luck is changing. And if you were a little better informed you’d realize that’s a GOOD THING.
Some communities, such as Umiujaq, are particularly at risk to be impacted by beaver expansion because of the geography, says Mikhaela Neelin, director of the Nunavik Hunting Fishing Trapping Association.
Umiujaq is one of the communities located just north of the treeline — the edge of the habitat where trees are capable of growing.
“In the tundra and a lot of regions, they’re seeing beavers appear there for the first time,” said Neelin, adding that the consequences are a mixed bag.
Mixed bag? You mean like the increased invertebrates resulting for beaver dams actually feeding MORE fish and I suppose maybe some competition for the char? And more things for wildlife to eat?
“It’s not black and white … beavers are often pretty beneficial. They do a lot,” said Neelin. However, she notes the negative consequences are more severe in the North.
“They migrate into the lake and even one big dam could really affect a fishing area,” said Neelin.
Beavers might also affect the quality of the water, says Neelin. As water systems and rivers get dammed, there is concern over whether water from the lake or river could still be consumed without treatment.
You know. With all that Beaver FEVER. Because we never ever had even single cases of Giardia before beavers moved in. Dam them. And sure I’ve hear they do SOME good things some places. But not here. Because we’re artic.
Part of the problem has to do with what Neelin calls the “shrubification” of Nunavik — with more willows and small branches growing in the region because of a warming environment.
“Willows for example, they would be at ankle height. Some of them are now at human height and with that amount of deciduous material beavers are able to survive in areas that they couldn’t before,” said Neelin.
“Climate change is really increasing the height.… So that’s a huge impact on beavers moving northwards.”
Those dam beavers. Always going where they aren’t wanted. Just so we remember the Yellowknife conference where this beaver group came together, YK is the community where a trapper reported a few years back “that beavers were so aggressive they spring on their tails like pogo sticks”
That’s the kind of image that stays with you. So I’m sure they know just what they’re talking about.
“The Inuit, we hardly work on [beavers],” Kumarluk says. “We don’t bother them.”
Kumarluk and Neelin represented Nunavik at a conference on the beaver’s Arctic expansion in Yellowknife last month.
Kumarluk says they recently bought a drone to survey the area and are trying to get a Cree elder to come to Umiujaq to teach the community how to control its growing beaver population.
“We really wish to teach the youngsters, the young people, even elders, how to trap beavers so that maybe we can control at least part of it,” said Kumarluk.
“Hopefully we will be able to get more funding.”
Hopefully we get More funding to teach more youngsters to kill MORE beavers. But when the char population continues to decline because the water gets warmer from climate change or they get eaten by new trout that move into the area we will just say it’s because we didn’t kill ENOUGH beavers soon enough.
Our minds are made up you know. Don’t tell us that beavers are good for salmonids. We know we’re right about this.
And beavers raise their young in the dam. No matter what you say.
4 comments on ““EVEN ONE DAM CAN REALLY AFFECT THE FISHING””
Mikhaela Neelin
January 2, 2023 at 8:40 amJournalists sometimes make mistakes since they’re not experts in the field, and unfortunately the article wasn’t allowed to be proof read before release. However, we identified the lodge/dam confusion very quickly and asked them to fix it. You can see the updated version here: https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6694226
heidi08
January 2, 2023 at 8:56 amI’m glad, there’s lots in this article I’d like to see re-examined.
Hendy
January 2, 2023 at 11:19 amThank you for this post.
The article: “Beavers expanding north bring damming consequences for Inuit and wildlife” is one of the top articles on CBC right now, and is being aggregated across the internet (Yahoo, CP, mailing lists, etc.). It’s littered with scientific assumptions with no data to support any of the conclusions.
Was the fish population in decline before their assumption that the Beaver dams are causing this? Fish don’t operate on a yearly cycle and each species operate on a different cycle from the others.
How have the fish and beavers co-evolved, worked in harmony for millions of years and been perfectly fine before man came along? .
We can see from studies that schools of fish that cannot jump over dams will work in schools and chip away at the weak points in the dam and break it open to squeak through. This is part of natural selection. Weak fish won’t make it through and the strong fish will. They work as a team to solve any hurdles that dams present. This needs to be taught to children so that we don’t have damaging pieces like this written by writers that have no background in this field, wrecking the minds of our children.
A lie travels halfway around the world before the truth puts on its shoes. By the time the truth catches up, it’s too late.
The journalist, Rachel Watts, has been writing for CBC for 11 months and hasn’t written a single piece that would qualify as a scientific article. Journalism requires the writer to investigate all sides of the story and present unbiased information leaving the reader to make up their own mind. This article fails to provide anything of the sort. It really is quite shameful.
This is a nuanced topic that needs more sources than what she and her editor have provided. This is the standard of the CBC these days and it is very sad to see our tax payer dollars paying for this article, which is really a press release.
heidi08
January 2, 2023 at 2:04 pmWow amen to everything you wrote. I hope you sent those comments to the CBC. With any luck we’ll get some real beaver reporting on the ground there soon. This ecological amnesia has to be checked.