Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Tag: USDA


A friend posted this 1927 technical bulletin from USDA on the beaver management facebook group Bailey beaver habits 1927. It was written by Vernon Bailey who was a biologist for their Investigation Bureau. There was some usual bunk about beavers causing troubles and a big discussion of how to manage them on farms, but there were unexpected tidbits I think you’ll really appreciate.

Child with beaver 1927 USDAIn case you can’t read the caption it says “Baby beavers are gentle and affectionate.  These animals would be delightful playmates for children if they did not sleep most of their day and carry on their activities mostly at night”. No kidding!

In addition to idly pointing out that baby beavers are sweet, this early bulletin shows some ways to manage beaver conflicts – including wrapping trees ;

The trees cut by beavers for food^ and building material are generally of little value. They are mainly aspens, cottonwoods,birches, and pin cherries, or such shrubby woods as willows,alders, bush maples, hazels, and smaller bushes. Some choice trees,however, are occasionally cut along lake or stream fronts or in orchards near the water, and complaints of real damage and losses are at times registered; but in many cases the trees could be protected with strips of woven wire at a cost of a few cents each and the beavers left unmolested.

And even an early flow device design;

Capture

Remember this was published 87 years ago. And not by some crazy beaver lover like me, but by their own biologist. In 2014 USDA is still saying there is no way to manage beavers or control flooding. Even Jimmy Taylor says the issue needs “more research”. When did the I.Q. of beaver management fall off so badly?

But this is the part that made my jaw drop.

It is often charged that beavers interfere with or injure fishing in streams where they build dams, and some persons still believe that they catch and eat fish. There is, however, no evidence of a beaver ever catching, killing, or eating any animal food. Of all captive beavers kept and studied and of young beavers raised, not one has been found that would touch or eat fish or meat in any form.

That beaver dams may in some cases, in slow or sluggish streams,spread out the water over marsh vegetation, forming shallow, warm ponds with decaying plants on the bottom quite unsuited to trout or fish of any kind is well known. Usually, however, such streams are not important fish streams before dammed by the beavers, and in course of time the water is freed from such decaying matter and is as satisfactory for fishes as before.

In cold, rapid streams, naturally well adapted to trout, beaver ponds rarely become sufficiently warm and stagnant to interfere with the comfort of fishes, and in most cases the deepening and extending of the water area above the dam increases the feeding and spawning area,providing deep pools and hiding places where the fishes thrive and escape detection long enough to grow up to larger size. In many streams both in the mountains and over a vast expanse of north country the trout fishing is greatly benefited by the presence of beavers, their dams, and ponds. Large trout and good fishing are commonly found in beaver ponds.

So the frickin’ USDA knew 100 years ago that beavers were good for fish and PEI is still stomping around killing beavers to protect salmon. That’s infuriating. The issues around beaver management are a mobius strip where whenever we think we are done addressing the last concern we find we are right back at the beginning again.

Honestly if you have a free moment, I would go check out the whole thing. Skip through the part about how to kill them or cook them but there’s a very nice passage about beaver vocalizations I’ll share as it made me think of mom.

Old beavers are generally supposed to be voiceless, except for a loud blowing sound made when scared or angry, but one day when photographs were being taken of the old beaver and her six young the young became chilly in the cold spring water, and when their mother was out of sight they began crying and calling for her in distressed tones. Soon from the shade of the other bank where she was lying on the water, she raised her nose slightly above the surface and made several soft mooing notes, like a long o-o-o-o pronounced with the lips closed. At once recognizing the call, the young quickly swam across and climbed up on her back, where they sat, warming their cold toes and tails in her fur and combing the water out of their hair, perfectly contented.

Mom beaver 2008: Photo Cheryl Reynolds
Mom beaver 2008: Photo Cheryl Reynolds


I got a letter yesterday at the office from Wildlife Services in MA. As you may remember, right around the time that Tom Knudson at the Sacramento Bee was writing about what a dangerous, wasteful, rogue arm of government the USDA had become, the Bay State was looking at some of there more gristly and dangerous solutions and thinking that “why can’t we do that?”

I wrote back with more than the usual cautions and caveats, as well as a pretty clear reading of history. Apparently I was persuasive enough to get a response from the governor’s secretary and a smattering of reporters. Yesterday I was politely reminded that the wilddeath services of Massachusetts had carefully  listened to everyone’s concerns but decided to do what they damned well wanted anyway.

The study is referred as a FONSI ‘finding of no significant impact’. That is – impact to humans. I assuming there would be a significant impact to the beavers themselves, because otherwise what’s the point?



Is your family big enough to have one of those cousins that always got in trouble at family gatherings for chasing the cat or trampling grandma’s petunia bed or stealing cookies off the dessert tray before dinner was even served? You know the kind that started taking Ritalin in grade school after he set fire to his friend’s dad’s garage? Maybe he went on to be come a challenging teen who slouched through high school smoking weed and skipping classes before getting his girlfriend pregnant and  dropping out entirely. The family eventually stops expecting him for Thanksgiving and finally  only mentions him in hushed “bad-seed” tones .

UNTIL one evening he’s suddenly on the news for saving a baby from a burning building, or opening a dance club that attracted a movie star or maybe even finding a cure for throat cancer. The point is, that this thuggy kid that no one expected anything good to come out of, suddenly shines by doing something amazing and the first reaction out of the family, even though its really, really good news, is just, “HUH???”

Well, meet your cousin.

The Forest Service is known for developing partnerships to get the greatest good out of scarce fiscal resources. On the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest one of the partners is four-legged.

Human activity has damaged the habitat for many species in and around the streams and rivers in eastern Oregon.

The Forest Service hopes to reverse these decades of neglect by first restoring beaver habitat and enticing the animals back in several tributary streams of the North Fork Burnt River.

Beavers have a knack for environmental restoration,” says Suzanne Fouty, District Hydrologist for the Whitman Ranger District.

“As they build their dams in streams they transform those systems from single thread channels with narrow riparian zones to complex systems with wide riparian zones. Beaver dams enhance watershed conditions by raising the water table in the valley floor leading to more forage, diversified and improved wildlife and fisheries habitat, and improved flood control,” she explained.

I’ve seen a lot of surprising things in my time as beaver crossing guard and I’ve covered stories from Saskatchewan to Sedona but I must say that I never expected to read ANYTHING like this from our very own USDA. It’s true that we mostly notice what happens at APHIS and the forestry service is a kinder, gentler, fruit-producing  branch but still I must have stared at that page for five minutes before I believed the acronym. Suddenly I risk becoming the bitter grandma with a grudge who can hardly bring herself to say something nice when the kid does better than anyone expected him too.

The goal is to have beavers establish a core zone of stable beaver dam complexes that will allow them to expand their water storage and modification influences outwards into other tributaries.

“It’s exciting to be part of a project that has multiple partners, can begin to yield results within a couple of years, is cost effective and produces multiple environmental and economic benefits,” says Fouty.

Wow. Just wow. Suzanne Fouty is a beaver hero of epic proportions and is obviously doing something amazing by nudging things on the inside one stream at a time. I’m so grateful for her work and pleased that it caught the attention of Matthew Burks who posted it for all to see that I won’t even comment on the blog’s kind of creepy  motto of “Reaching out. Every day in every way“. I’ll just enjoy this moment for what it is, and hope for more on the horizon. Bring on the fatted calf or whatever…

And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have is thine. It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad: for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and is found.


Some people say I’m too negative about the USDA. I’m always berating them for their vicious beaver/woodpecker/goose-killing ways. Maybe I should be more balanced. Say something nice about them for a change.

Okay.

Once I was attending a lecture in graduate school and, bored beyond belief, I glanced down at my sweater sleeve. It happened to have tiny flecks of color in the wool and the random pattern was fun to look at – or more fun than the lecture anyway. This time, though, the tiny  flecks were moving.

I left class in a panic, certain I had such a bad case of head lice that they were dropping off in droves. I drove straight to the daycare where I’d worked forever knowing they could help. They fearlessly sat me down and checked my head. Then said, nope not lice.

I bug bombed the house. Threw out the sweater and shivered my way onwards. I didn’t see any more crawlies. I thought I was safe. Chalk it up to experience.

Next week I went back to class. Same teacher, same room, (practically the same lecture). I glanced down to keep from falling asleep and saw MORE CRAWLING!!!!!!!

This time I caught a few of the escapees. Someone told me to bring them to USDA in Concord to figure out what they were. They soberly took my tiny bugs. Dropped them in a vial of fermaldehyde and shipped to  Sacramento. It was surreal, but oddly comforting. 2 weeks later the report came back.


Acacia Psyllids


As it happened they were Acacia Psyllids, a problem for the trees but not harmful to us or sweaters, and I had to walk through Acacia trees to get to class. And that, ladies and gentleman, is a good use of the USDA.

Now lets talk about this next story.

Seems there was an apartment complex in South Carolina that sported some recovering geese, injured by fishing line and beloved by residents. (Well, SOME of the residents).

Taxpayers subsidizing wild life extermination program, probe shows

By MARY LOU SIMMS

The trucks pulled up at dawn. PollyAnna, a year-old disabled goose whose wing feathers were growing back, was asleep when the trappers approached.  Not long after, Debbie Dangerfield, a real estate agent and 16-year resident of River’s Edge, a sprawling residential complex in Charleston, S.C., was leaving her condo to check on PollyAnna when she noticed she was missing. Also gone were a dozen or so geese parents and their young.

The crippled geese also seemed to have vanished: Nibbles, a young gander with a damaged wing; Limp, so-named because of an upper-leg injury, and VeeVee, the victim of fishing-line entrapment. 

As Dangerfield approached the entrance to the complex, she noticed two USDA trucks pulling away from the guard house and broke into a dead run, reaching the vehicles as they slowed to accommodate speed bumps. She begged the drivers to pull over, peering inside one of the trucks as they did.

There she saw PollyAnna crammed into a crate with half a dozen other geese.

Ouch. That seems harsh. I know you have jobs to do and all, saving airways from disabled geese or whatever, but just FYI, you probably shouldn’t ever take wildlife with a name. Don’t worry. They weren’t completely heartless. They did give her the “Sophie’s Goose Choice”

Eventually the police came and the River’s Edge management agreed to let her keep one bird.

Mary Lou’s EXCELLENT article follows goose-killing in New Jersey, Alabama, Mississippi and Oregon. It’s a grim shocking look at a fairly invisible outrage. She describes a freedom of Information Act-forced disclosure documenting countless wildlife killed by the USDA. (Including beavers of course.) Since the article is paid for by a private DC grant, and she works for the McClatchy Tribune (Same as the reporter I spoke with before the festival) I have to imagine that this data is making the rounds and going to generate a few similar stories in the future.

Good. It’s about time everyone realized what Unfeeling Sadists Do to Animals.


Look what’s in this Oklahoma paper this morning!






 

Beavers are a Keystone species whose dams make significant habitat for wildlife and act as natural filters improving water quality. Flooding problems can be controlled using modern flow devices and culvert fences, described here.

Your own Ned Bruha (Skunk Whisperer) has been trained in their use and could help save your city save hundreds of tax-payer dollars in trapping costs which will need to be repeated again every year.

It’s unfortunate that your beavers need to use trash for their restorative work. Wouldn’t it be nice if public works spent time removing the trash instead of removing the dams? It is true that beavers can carry Giardiasis and other diseases. They do not cause them. If your beavers are infected it’s because your water is infected and that should generally be a concern to your city. Contrary to Ms. Haye’s alarm about mosquitoes research has shown that dams actually decrease harmful mosquito larvae

It would be wonderful if the city of Sand Springs, starved for water much of the year, could learn to manage the presence of these remarkable hydrological engineers.

Any city smarter than a beaver can keep a beaver.

Heidi Perryman, Ph.D.
President & Founder
Worth A Dam

If you don’t remember the Sand Springs story, click on this week’s “whose killing beavers now” for the full story. Or partial story. I didn’t realize at the time I wrote this that Oklahoma uses USDA to kill thousands of beavers, more than any other state in the vicinity. This means that this state, which is arguably the most noisily against government spending, relies almost exclusively on massive federal funds to kill beavers. In fact, comparing Oklahoma to other states in terms of federal moneys paid versus federal taxes received, they are the 15th in the entire country. (CA is the 43rd – meaning we give more federal taxes and receive far less in return.) Oklahoma not only kills more beavers than we do, they do it almost exlusively on the government dollar.

Ned called it beaver-killing wellfare.




DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!