Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Tag: Kroeber


The Miwok tribe  ranged from the north coast to the Sierra Foothills and Yosemite. They were the tribe associated with acorn grinding and if you’ve never seen a grinding rock you should stop by Chaw’se on your way to the Sierras someday and imagine all those lost conversations that must have taken place while the women worked side-by-side. Kroeber was especially interested in them because he believed they were one of the few native american tribes whose spirituality incorporated totems. We are particularly interested in them because two thirds of the tribe lived where beavers supposedly didn’t.

Yesterday I found an origin myth that I think makes a pincushion of that particular belief. It is an origin myth recorded by Edward Winslow Gifford in 1917 – 5 years before any beaver were reintroduced any where. Its the story about how the Miwok learned to make arrows for hunting. and since they were completely dependent on this adaption it is a tale of some importance.

The tale is told with a sing-song repetitive pattern in which every important idea is repeated more than once. It begins with the two brothers Dove and Prairie Falcon (how can that end well?) bemoaning their inability to hunt.

“What shall we do, brother? What shall we do? I would like to hunt. I do not know how we are to hunt. I do not know how we are to hunt. I do not know how we shall be able to hunt. I should like very much to hunt. I do not know how we can make arrows. We have nothing with which to cut. We know of nothing with which to cut. I do not know how we can hunt. We have nothing with which to cut. We do not know how to cut. I would like very much to hunt, brother. I do not know how we are to arrange it, but we will try. We have nothing with which to cut. I should like you and me to hunt together, brother. We have nothing with which to hunt.”

Wow, reading that paragraph is like sitting in a small room with an anxious asperger’s child, but I digress. It gets the point across rather vividly. The brothers had NO IDEA what to do. They NEEDED a solution. I guess the thinking is that when you fully grasp their desperation you might be more inclined to understand if not accept their solution.

“Let us throw our grandmother into the water. If she does not want to go, we will pull her in, We will throw the old woman, our grandmother, into the water. After you have thrown her into the water, pull her out quickly. Pull her out quickly. Do not keep her in the water long. Do not keep her in the water long.”

Well, that’s probably not the first thing I would have tried, but let’s see how it works.

Then Dove went. Dove went. He threw his grandmother into the water, threw her into the water. After he had thrown her into the water, be pulled her out quickly. He pulled her out quickly.  His brother said to him, “Pull one of her teeth. We will make a knife of it.” Then he pulled one of her teeth, pulled one of her teeth. After they obtained the tooth, they commenced to cut, commenced to cut.

At this point I understand if you’re thinking doubtfully, hey I thought you said this was going to be about beavers! Not elder abuse. Two juvenile delinquents dismantling their grandmother for parts is hardly the basis for a creation myth. When do we get to the part about beavers? Bear with me, it’s coming. I will spare you the part where they saw a pine bough with her tooth and  take out her sinew and use it for a string. She’s not exactly dead, but she’s not happy.

Their grandmother went into the water and cried and worried about herself. She said, “I did not think my boys would treat me this way.” Then the grandmother, who had turned into Beaver, said, “I will have revenge upon those boys.” She told the water to drown Prairie Falcon. The water came, while Prairie Falcon was digging, and drowned him. Dove escaped.

Whoa! Didn’t see that coming did you! Grandma turns into a beaver and she’s pretty homicidal.  Dove wails and cries (that’s why he’s always in mourning, get it?) and eventually Grandma makes sure he and Prairie Falcon gets dragged about the countryside and scraped pretty badly. “Spark” brings them back to life and they begin to see the error of their ways.

Now they had no grandmother. Prairie Falcon cried because his grandmother had turned into Beaver. They both cried and cried for their grandmother. They did not know how to get back their grandmother. They went along the river. They saw Beaver In the riffle, They said, “There is Beaver.” Beaver was their grandmother. They used to take their grandmother everywhere they went, but they lost their grandmother because of the arrows. At last they abandoned the search for her and went home. Their grandmother had turned into Beaver. Everybody made arrows thereafter. Dove, cried for his grandmother. Prairie Falcon cried, but they made arrows. They lost then, grandmother because of the arrows.

So Beaver helped Miwok make arrows. Meaning they made arrows sometimes out of beaver teeth, or used beaver teeth knives to carve arrows out of other material.Meaning that they had beavers. Meaning that historically beavers had a wider a range in California than Grandmothers.

North American bows, arrows, and quivers By Otis Tufton Mason


The hero who wrote down this story nearly 100 years ago was Edward W. Gifford. He was born in Oakland and took over the native museum in Yosemite from Kroeber when he retired. In all his prodigious work documenting native customs and people I can find no mention of his heritage, but looking at that very gentle face I would argue that his ethnicity speaks for itself.



Have I mentioned that I thought CDFG does an extremely thoughtful, honest job and was very respectful of wildlife in general and beavers in particular? Sorry, just wanted to know how it felt to type that. It’s opposite day. I’m perfectly sure I mentioned the other thing.

Well RL has been working on research of the California Fur Rush to document just where beavers were historically, and came across this paper, from Factless & Guilty describing the reintroduction of beavers in the 1930’s. Brace yourself for the author’s name and tell me that’s not destiny. You see the Mendocino reintroduction wasn’t a special case, this was happening all over the state. After the fur trade killed nearly all the beavers, there were none as far as the eye could see. Seems people had started to notice that without beavers the watershed doesn’t work as well.

“It is now understood that soil erosion and shortage of water in some places resulted from the destruction of the beavers, which formerly built, and kept in repair, dams on the upper reaches of many streams. The dams were the effective means of impounding water of the spring runoff, and distributing them slowly downstream through the summer.”

Tappe 1941

That was a great sentence, Mr. Tappe. Can I just pause a moment and enjoy the wisdom embedded in that sentence? Sigh. Unfortunately he keeps writing, summarizing the horrifically greedy fur trade forrays and the loss of beaver from everwhere. He describes the historic presence of beaver, and says:

However, as far as could be learned, these animals confined themselves to the parts of the stream below the 1000 foot level.

Got that? No beavers above the 1000 foot elevation originally. No beavers in Tahoe, or the Sierras, or Yosemite. No beavers on Mt. Diablo or Mt. Lassen. No beavers but the ones WE put there. Fish and Game has spoken in its infinite wisdom, every other naturalist in the world writes down this fact and puts it in books that get quoted. So that  70 years later they are killing beavers in Kings Beach because they’re “not native.”

You know what’s funny about that “native” word? There were these people here, before fish & game, before the trappers, before the missionaries. They like to think of themselves as Native. I’m thinking there must have been tribes above 1000 feet with lore/language/artwork that proves they lived with beaver. Lets look at what they have to say:

Hmmm, A.L. Kroeber is considered the expert on California Natives, my Dad pointed me to this book, which is partially online at the Yosemite Library. Handbook of Indians of California 1919. Chapter 30 talks about the Miwok tribe, which stretches from the central coast all the way to the Sierras. The Miwok are interesting to Kroeber because of their particular spiritual/lineage beliefs

With the Miwok we encounter for the first time a social scheme that recurs among several of the groups to the south: a division of the people into balanced halves, or moieties, as they are called, which are totemic, and adhesion to which is hereditary. The descent is from the father, and among the Miwok . the moieties were at least theoretically exogamic. The totemic aspects of these moieties are refined to an extreme tenuousness, but are undeniable. Nature is divided into a water and a land or dry half, which are thought to correspond to the Kikua and Tunuka moieties among the people.

So everyone and everything belongs to either the “land” moiety or the “water” moiety, and Kroeber kindly goes on to list which animals are classified in which group. Guess what’s on the list? Beaver, (water obviously) But he also notes that for the Yokuts the assignments with regard to beaver were reversed. This means all the Miwok used the beaver’s totemic meaning. Why would they do this if they had never seen a beaver? Thanks Dad!

The Modoc used beaver teeth as dice.Many burials around this area included the addition of a beaver mandible for ceremonial purposes. There are linguistic papers documenting the vocabulary of the word beaver from the Sacramento Valley to the Klamath.

For instance, beaver is unanalyzable Yurok teguuk, Hupa chwa’, but in Karuk it is sah-pihnîich ‘by.the.river–old.man’.

(Isn’t that a great name? By-the-River Old-Man!) Okay, not convinced beaver were above 1000 feet? How about this rock painting from the Tule Reservation, located at an elevation of 1600 feet and estimated to be between 500-700 years old.

That should do it. High-five everyone! Day of Research produces! Breakout the champagne and the willow leaves! Okay, I feel we’ve successfully laid to rest the spurious clam that there were no beaver above 1000 feet. I’ll expect your retraction and apology in the morning. In the mean time what’s this? On the new Fish & Game website?

Non-Native & Nuisance Terrestrial Vertebrates

Check out the mammal section.

Castoridae (Beavers)
Castor canadensis

*Some populations were introduced into the Sierra Nevada and Southern California from stock taken from Oregon and Washington.

Sigh. Time for a class action lawsuit?

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!