File this under the “I could have told you that!” department.

Researchers find adverse effects of apex predator reintroduction: ‘The conservation message is don’t lose them in the first place’

A 20-year study on the effects of reintroducing wolves into Yellowstone National Park found that removing the apex predators has caused far more damage than expected to the park’s ecosystem.

Colorado State University researchers launched the study in 2001 to determine if bringing gray wolves, grizzly bears, and cougars back to Yellowstone’s northern range would help its food web and ecosystem recover, according to the university’s summary of the study.

However, without predators to keep the ecosystem balanced, elk numbers skyrocketed to unsustainable levels, which led to the decimation of willow and aspen trees along small streams. In turn, beavers that used willows as a food and shelter source left the area, which meant the trees’ root systems no longer benefited from the flooding caused by beaver dams.

“When you disturb ecosystems by changing the makeup of a food web, it can lead to lasting changes that are not quickly fixed,” Tom Hobbs, lead author and professor emeritus with the Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability and the Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, said in the report.

According to the United Nations Foundation, biodiversity loss creates numerous problems for humans since we’re also part of the circle of life. Mass extinctions, more extreme weather, food supply issues, and increased bacterial and viral diseases are just a handful of problems caused by destabilizing the climate.

Much like pulling a block out of a Jenga tower, removing one species or disrupting one part of the climate creates a shaky foundation for the whole planet.

Eliminating crucial Yellowstone species harms water and food sources for animals and impacts the entire food web. While the ecosystems can recover, as the researchers noted, it can take decades for them to be fully restored.

“The conservation message is don’t lose them in the first place,” Hobbs said. “Keep the food web intact, because there’s not a quick fix for losing top predators from ecosystems.”

Scientists thought the reintroduction of wolves to the park in 1995 would allow the animals and plants to recover from the cascading effects of losing apex predators, but they found it wasn’t that simple, as the summary stated.

While cougars and grizzlies have made a comeback, bison herds have replaced many elk. Since they share the elks’ food sources, willow and aspen trees remain threatened.

That’s because you didn’t keep the BEAVERS. If you had that goal in mind the WHOLE time you would have understood that you needed some elk-removers to keep the willow around and you would have protected the too often credit-stealing wolves.

The researchers hope the study, which was the longest of its kind, will encourage the conservation of the planet’s large carnivores and ecosystems in general.

Thankfully, there’s plenty of promising news in that regard. One study found that 29 species in Australia have recovered from the brink of extinction because of persistent conservation efforts.

Scientists are also using biobanking to collect cell samples from endangered species and potentially launch breeding programs or cloning to restore biodiversity.

Don’t overwhelm these people with data. They just need to focus on ONE thing. It’s very simple really. Protect the beavers and their food. That’s it.

Everything else. the birds and the frogs and the fish and the bats and all the things that eat them, will follow along accordingly.