Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Category: Who’s Killing Beavers Now?


If you were looking for Lewisporte on a map (and I can’t imagine why you would be) you would need to go all the way across the united states. Past North Dakota and New York and Vermont. All the way up past Maine. Past New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. Past Labrador and East coast of Canada. Into the cold Atlantic ocean and  onto the very last shivering northern island of Newfoundland – the very last stop on the very stretched out fingertips of an entire continent.

And THEN – once your on the very last piece of land before endless blue – go to the upper most farthest corner- practically the farthest place IN the farthest place – before you can find Lewisporte. There is a sliver of NL to their east, but basically It is so far into the blue that their closest neighbor to the North is Greenland, to the south is Guyana, and to the East is Spain.

This city is quite literally as far away as it can possibly be and still be North American.

And it has a problem with beavers. All the way out there. Are we surprised?

Dealing with the dam problem: Lewisporte hopes to trap beavers to prevent flooding

LEWISPORTE, N.L. — In hopes of preventing future floods, the town of Lewisporte is tackling a beaver problem. At their town council meeting Jan. 29, Coun. Stephen Hollet expressed concern around beaver dams in the watershed area near the Scissors Cove brook area.

With more frequent heavy rainfalls in recent years, and with memories of the flooding in 2016, the town council suspects these dams are playing a significant role in rising water levels and increasing flood risks.

“We never had that level of flooding before, even with storms like Hurricane Igor,” Hollett told The Central Voice. “The only thing that’s changed in that area is the presence of dams. We’ve noticed heavy rains are starting to occur more than what we use to see.

Because beavers are worse than hurricanes. Didn’t you know?

The town has contacted Ewen Whiteway, a licensed trapper in Lewisporte, to trap the beavers and remove them from the brook. According to Coun. Ken Tucker, while this may alleviate some of the problem, there is a risk that the beavers will return again.

“It’s only a temporary solution [if the beavers return],” Tucker said. “I think we’ll have to put in a plan of monitoring the area once or twice a year, particularly in the late summer and fall. It’s in our best interest to stay on top of the issue.”

The town council also decided to write a letter to Dept. of Fisheries and Land Resources Minister Gerry Byrne to seek input from the province. Because of the flood risks these dams pose to the infrastructure and safety of the community, Coun. Perry Pond says the department holds some responsibility.

The department said in an emailed statement that they deal with furbearers on a case by case basis, and while there are options for conservation officers to tackle the problem, hiring local trappers is the preferred solution during winter  months.

You didn’t actually say how beavers are causing a the flooding. Dams in the watershed area of scissors brook cove? Your town is so very remote I cannot actually find this on a map, But I assume the dams are backing up water in the creek before it can reach the cove. Which is flooding someone’s back yard or driveway, i guess.

I would mention that trapping is a temporary solution and that installing a flow device would address this issue for the long term. But honestly, what’s the point?

Beavers are worse than hurricanes.


Same as it ever was.
Same as it ever was.
Same as it ever was.

Illinois is no exception.

Fearing floods, Prospect Heights removing beavers, dam from creek

Prospect Heights is removing at least two beavers and the dam they’ve built on McDonald Creek in a local park because of concerns about flooding.

The decision is drawing criticism from some members of the city’s natural resource commission and highlights the problems that many suburbs contend with when wildlife and people try to coexist.

I know what you’re thinking. Another trapping story? Good lord can’t you write about anything else? but this ones different. It’s special. It has a natural resources commission.

“I’m really sad about it, but it’s a done deal for now,” Agnes Wojnarski, chairwoman of the natural resources commission, said during a meeting last week.

“Due to the nature of where they’re located, there’s just no way they could stay there and not negatively impact residents,” said Peter Falcone, assistant to the city administrator.

Well sure, it’s a natural resources commission without any power or oversight but hey, that’s something right?

Seth Marcus, another member of the natural resource commission, said during the meeting that the city could have studied other solutions such as installing pipes under the dam to allow water through or trapping and sterilizing the beavers before returning them to the site to prevent others from moving in.

“The point is that there are solutions that may or may not win the discussion of the day, but it would be nice to at least be consulted before,” Marcus said.

However, the city is concerned that the dam could cause flooding upstream or become dislodged during a major storm and block drainage pipes, Falcone said.

“I would love to coexist with the beavers, but it’s not feasible,” Falcone said.

Now, now. I know what you’re thinking. But this is Illinois and we’re grading on a curve. Knowing that folks wanted to at least mention flow devices before dispatching the animals is a kind of triumph.

Baby steps for babies.

For several months, city public works crews have been removing the beavers’ dam, but each time the animals rebuilt, officials said. Finally, the city hired a company to trap and remove the beavers. Once they’re gone, the city will remove the dam a final time.

I’m so old I remember the first time i wrote about the unfathomable efforts of a public works crew tearing down the dam every week and being surprised when the beavers rebuilt. I believe I mocked “Ohh that’s unfortunate. You must have one of those rare rebuilding beavers. That almost never always happens.”

Same as it ever was,


Ever notice how city officials are very selective on where they can ‘comment’? If the issue happens to be in their interest or in accord with what they want the public to know they’re eager to offer their thoughts. We got so many comments from our city about why beavers were going to cause flooding. We could barely shut them up.

But when it’s something they don’t want to talk about they’re as tight-lipped as an oyster bed. Just sayin’.

Report on beaver trapping in Framingham still pending

Framingham officials would not say how many beavers were killed in the recent trapping operation aimed at flood prevention.They said they would not comment until a DPW report about the operation is complete.

In response to questions from the Daily News, officials from both the Conservation Commission and the Department of Public Works said they aren’t ready to discuss what occurred.

“We are in the process of filing a report with the Conservation Commission as part of a requirement of the emergency permit process,” a DPW spokesman wrote. Rob McArthur, the city’s conservation administrator, said his office is waiting for the report. McArthur said he does not know how many beavers were killed last month. He did not respond to questions regarding the effect of the beaver trapping on flooding.

Do you hear that rattling sound? That’s the sound of the proverbial can being kicked down the road a ways. Framingham got A LOT of attention and press about killing these particular beavers. They are hoping to wait until no one cares anymore before they tell them how many.

I was in the hospital while all these shenanagins went on. So depending on how you look at it, they either missed an opportunity or lucked out completely.

Well, not completely.

But the decision to eliminate the beavers upset some residents and drew criticism from the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which urged the city to consider alternatives. The group contacted Mayor Yvonne Spicer and city councilors in December, urging them to consider alternatives to trapping, such as culvert protectors and devices that restore the flow of water.

Sometimes called “beaver deceivers,” the devices use pipes to allow water to pass through areas with beaver dams without triggering the animals’ natural instinct to impede running water. More than 1,000 such devices are now in use throughout Massachusetts, providing a more humane and inexpensive way to regulate beaver-related flooding, according to animal rights advocates.

Ahh it’s nice to see this made it all the way into the human socity’s attention and the papers. Good for everyone involved. I hope at least our website helped some bystander looking for information. You know, Martinez, the city on the hill and all that.

However, beaver trapping remains controversial. Opponents say water flow devices provide a better, cheaper alternative, since beavers will quickly repopulate an area and build dams after the population there is thinned.

Dave Wattles, a furbearer biologist at the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, said the circumstances in each body of water are different, and trapping is sometimes the best solution.

“Every situation cannot be solved with those flow devices,” he said, “so in reality, in order to prevent conflict with modern society, doing what they did and removing the beaver is … probably the best case scenario.”

Remind me to have a conversation with Mr. Wattles. and to introduce him to Mr. Callahan. Never you mind that this city is an hour drive from Beaver Solutions and they still couldn’t find their way out of a paper bag.

I hope you continue to have lots of media questions about this and that your egos are still bruised when the NEXT family of beavers settle in, because it will not be long.


Why is it that everyone who hates beavers in Massachusetts looks and sounds exactly the same? No, really. I’m not kidding. Change the name and you could run the same story over and over.

Natick: Some want beavers removed at Dug Pond

NATICK – Bill Kinsman says he knows what is causing damage along the shore of Dug Pond.

“There’s no doubt about it,” Kinsman said as he walked Wednesday past two oak trees that had a significant amount of their trunks nibbled away.

Kinsman believes beavers are the culprits, and it’s hard to argue with him. Several trees have seen the effects of the gnashing of beaver teeth, with wood shavings scattered about as evidence. Others have that classic cone-shape that occurs just before a tree topples after excessive nibbling.

Kinsman was joined by his wife, Karen, on his stroll along the pond. Karen Kinsman, 58, grew up on the pond, and spent many hours playing in the nearby woods. She hates to see beavers destroy her beloved trees.

“If I had a choice between beavers and the trees, I would choose the trees,” Karen said.

How about if your choice was between beavers and drought or beavers and fewer birds? Would you still pick the trees? Something tells me you would.

A trapper could be hired, but a damage assessment and getting a sense of how many beavers are involved would first have to be determined, White said. Permits would also be needed to eradicate the beavers, and the entire process, including trapping the critters, requires approval by the Board of Health and Conservation Commission.

This isn’t the first time Natick has faced a beaver problem. Just last year, the town hired a trapper to kill beavers at St. Patrick’s Cemetery along Dug Pond.

“There was a lot of beaver activity (at the cemetery),” White said. The problem extended along Lakeview Avenue to Windsor Avenue, and there was a second area of beaver activity, from Farwell Street to Cottage Street to Countryside Road. White said the town thought the problem was solved, but after one population was removed, another arrived.

Wait. Just hold on a second. You JUST said that after on family was killed another arrived. Didn’t you just say that? So clearly killing a family isn’t the secret way to solving your problem. Maybe, oh I don’t know wrapping the friggin’ trees you want to protect would be a better solution?

Bill said it’s a public safety issue, pointing to tree nibbled on by beavers that fell into the pond, because it could have hit an unsuspecting swimmer or boater.

While they hate to see anything bad happen to the beavers, the couple say it’s more important to protect the natural beauty around Dug Pond.

And, Bill thinks the beaver nibbling extends beyond trees. He mentioned a metal piece on his canoe chewed down to a nub.

“What else would have done that?” Kinsman asked.

Oh Puleeze! You think a beaver chewed your canoe? You think beavers are public safety hazards? You’re a public safety hazard. Goodness gracious. It’s too bad your canoe was chewed but anything could have done that. I doubt it was a beaver. Your puppy. A passing toddler. A porcupine. 

Any why do reporters allow people to say they want beavers ‘removed’. Why don’t they make them say they want them killed? And why isn’t the title of this article “Natick: Some want another temporary solution at Dug pond.”

Honestly. when is the bay state going to get ANY smarter about beavers? I’m holding my breath.

“I wish the beavers could be relocated, but I don’t want to lose what little forest we have left,” Karen said.


Another day of unbreatheable air for us while rescue workers in Paradise sift through the unimaginable looking for victims of the camp fire. There are 1000 people still missing and we know what that means. In the mean time there are beaver stories that merit our attention. It’s winter in many parts of the US that aren’t currently on fire. And that’s never good news for beavers.

Traps poised for sharp-toothed wanderers

Beavers are being trapped along the Alaska Highway across from the Meadow Lakes Golf Club as a precaution, says conservation officer David Bakica.

The Department of Highways and Public Works (DPW) is afraid the buildup of water behind the dam the beavers have created could push against the gravel road bed and compromise its strength, Bakica explained recently.

The water is already inside the right-of-way, he pointed out.

The devices installed a couple of years ago at the mouth of the highway culvert to prevent the beavers from damming the culvert is working well, Bakica told the Star. The beavers have, however, decided to block the creek upstream from the culvert, within the highway right-of-way, he said.

So the culvert protection you used a couple years ago is working, but the beavers have dammed upstream and rather that build on the success of a couple years ago and install a flow device, you are choosing to kill them in winter.

As it was explained to him by Highway staff, when water sits against a roadbed, every time a vehicle passes over it, the roadbed acts as sponge, pulling in water and heightening the risk of failure, he said.

To date, five have been trapped, though they’re still not certain if all the beavers have been removed, Bakica said Thursday.

Waiting for ice cover not only increases the safety aspect, but it’s also easier to target the entrances and exits of the beaver lodge, he explained.

DPW wants to pull down the dam, but to do so while the beavers are still in there would be inhumane, as the animals would eventually freeze to death without water or become easy prey, he said.

In other words DPW thinks beaver live IN the dam because DPW is almost always stupid.

Bakica said relocating beavers really isn’t feasible in most cases. It’s costly, and can simply mean moving a problem from one area to another, he pointed out.

DPW’s Doris Wurfbaum said the intent is to break down the dam this winter so that the water is free-flowing come spring.

I’m going to assume that the fact that you installed culvert protection 2 years ago at all means that public pressure cared about these beavers and forced your hand. Hey killing after the freeze has another benefit of keeping the beaver-lovers away so they won’t complain too much!

You know there’s another way to do this, right?

North American Beaver
Castor canadensis
Eating willow
Martinez, CA by Suzi Eszterhas

We need to remember that beaver stupid still exists everywhere and its not all hearts and Ben’s book out there. I was stunned to see this complaint whine its way across my news feed the other day.

Salmon Runs in the Columbia River system are being systematically ruined by the pseudo science ecologist/ environmentalists who are incharge.

If it was not for the pseudo science of ecology we could have infinitely more fish in northwest rivers and beyond.  The environmentalists actually are the real cause of fish declines. 

Wow. Ecology is a pseudo-science and environmentalists cause fish decline. The mind boggles. The jaw drops.

The Indian tribes controlled the salmon at these points of difficult uphill cascades passage in the gorge for several thousand years.  The river was much more polluted than it is today when salmon runs were much larger.  The Indian populations along the Columbia river were higher per square mile concentrated along the river than anywhere else in north America at the time in pre Columbian times.   Beavers had everything dammed and were so numerous the river was fouled by Beaver feces and from the Indian populations along the rivers and streams.  Those nutrients fed the salmon runs. 

Got that? The rivers used to be more polluted because of all the beaver poop. And all that poop fed the salmon. So now that there is less pollution there are less salmon. Because of the stupid ecologists.

In some ways today the rivers are too clean for fish to thrive as much as they can and fish hatcheries can also be placed further down stream to more tidal areas of the river system like in the Willamette river itself right downtown.  There is horrible missed opportunity in developing the ‘resource’ and worst of all the fisheries selected the best salmon for  the hatchery fish and the eco environmental flakes designate those as unnatural fish which is helping to destroy river and ocean survival traits of various species.   The truth is absolutely not allowed .  Ensured are stupid jobs for idiot people and the salmon and the economic value of these salmon is suffering as a result

If we were to substitute the word pollution for the words ‘nutrient-rich’ I could almost agree. Of course you can’t conflate what beaver do to rivers with what industrial or chemical companies do to rivers. There is zero comparison. The author is onto something though about lots of beavers resulting in lots of salmon, but he misunderstands the role that ecologists want to play in restoring rivers. Correlation isn’t causation. Just because they showed up when the salmon population started to fall apart doesn’t mean they caused it. Just like going to the hospital isn’t the cause of death.

I posted a comment in response and surprisingly he approved it and its still there. I’m not sure what that means, but I’m going to assume its a good sign. At least anyone else that visits the sight can see it.

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!