Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Month: January 2020


How is our old friend doing in Lyme? When last we visited authorities couldn’t find the beaver dam causing the problem so they were planning to use drones. They were certain the culprit must be a beaver, because the guilty party must ALWAYS be a beaver, The old man’s house was sinking farther and father below the floodline.

Seven months later, Old Lyme residents still search for solutions to beaver flooding

Old Lyme — The man whose property on Black Hall Pond is being flooded by nearby beaver activity is again calling on town officials to finally step up and help him solve his beaver woes.

Dave Berggren said with time running out to save his property at 17 Boughton Road, he is prepared to take legal action against the town now that he’s discovered a state statute outlining municipal jurisdiction to relieve such flooding.

But town officials say they aren’t so sure if Berggren is interpreting the law accurately, or even correctly pinpointing where the problem dams are, causing more confusion in what First Selectman Tim Griswold described as a tricky property issue that may need legal intervention, but which he said he has been trying to address.

Ahh it’s so delicate to settle an unknown cause with some known tax dollars, isn’t it? And once homeowners start slinging around those accusations everyone gets nervous. Remember how Martinez hopped to it when a certain creek property owner alleged his walls were cracking because beavers were tunneling under his home?

(Of course they weren’t. Because beavers are not gophers or jewelry thieves planning a heist, They have no need for a tunnel that goes AWAY from the water. But facts didn’t matter. A respected citizen and his lawyer were involved. Ahh those were good times!)

Berggren says he has lived on the pond for more than 50 years, battling the persistent flooding for more than four years. He says water levels have risen more than two feet during that time, turning his yard “into a soggy mess,” causing his house to slowly sink and damaging his septic system, among other issues. The flooding has been a problem for other residents living near the pond, who also recently have complained to the town.

The Department of Energy and the Environment has confirmed that beaver activity is causing the issues.

Over the years, Berggren said he’s tried contacting both DEEP and the town for help, specifically asking town officials to take action and help locate the dams, without any success.

In June, former First Selectwoman Bonnie Reemsnyder told The Day that because beaver dams were being built on private not town property, the town had no jurisdiction or power to resolve the issue.

“The town shouldn’t do anything about dams that are on private property,” Reemsnyder had said. “I can’t get a trapping permit for someone else’s property, but I can for town property.”

Since The Day last spoke to him in June, Berggren said the problem has gotten worse.

“Now, there’s black mold growing, and I’m having breathing issues,” he said. “This house isn’t beautiful, but I’ve liked it for all these years. But now I have to tear it down, because you can’t repair this. I have to tear it down.”

No word yet on how Deep KNOWS its beavers causing the problem but doesn’t know where the dam is. Or whether we might expect an 82 year old man to have breathing issues even without beavers. But hey. What do I know?

On Jan. 2, Berggren said he received what he thinks is the golden ticket to his relief in the form of a letter from DEEP, which included a copy of a state statute outlining that towns have the authority to clear waterways causing flooding, even if those waterways are not on town property.

“DEEP is telling us there is now a state law that the (town) can’t do what they’ve been doing down here,” Berggren said. “It’s now spelled out.”

Griswold says he isn’t sure Berggren is reading the statute properly. The law doesn’t say the town “will” help, it says the town “may,” Griswold said. “I think you would want to be a good neighbor and help him out. … You can argue the town can help, but the law doesn’t say it must help.”

Ha ha ha. There isn’t a single part of this article that doesn’t have at least some wool being pulled over some persons eyes. He tries to wheedle the city to pay for his problem and the city pays their attorneys to weasel out of it. It’s Martinez all over again. It’s Every City Ever.

The good news is their talking about bringing in the Callahan Calvary.

Griswold said if the town is forced to take action, he prefers to install “beaver deceivers” through the dams to divert water to other side of the dam, rather than find trappers to kill the beavers. He said that’s because it’s difficult to be sure all the beavers in an area are killed. He also said it would be a matter of time before other beavers inhabit the area and start the problem again.

“I suppose if there is a good dam and you had a massacre there, then other beavers might say, ‘Hmm, look at this. Abandoned dam. Let’s go,’” Griswold said.

Griswold said he’s been in contact with a drone flyer. If the drone flight doesn’t work, he said, he is considering hiring Michael Callahan, owner of Beaver Solutions LLC of Southampton, Mass. — whom the town previously hired to help with other beaver flooding issues — to assess the area and suggest solutions.

Callahan agreed by phone Friday that “beaver deceivers” are typically the most effective way to eradicate a beaver dam flooding issue while helping preserve the environment, and he typically suggests installing such devices in 75% of the cases he is called to address.

“About 25% of the time I will recommend trapping, because the devices we use won’t be feasible,” he said. “… But for trapping to work, (trappers) can’t even leave one beaver. That one beaver can rebuild. And in our experience, new ones will take over the area. Beavers are territorial, so they have to find their own places. Young ones will eventually be moving in.”

Callahan said “beaver deceivers,” on the other hand, can cost about $2,000, take about a day to install and the piping will last for 10 years or more before fencing around the pipe needs to be replaced.

“We are not yet exactly sure how this situation will be addressed,” Griswold said. “But we, at the very least, think we can get in there and do something about it.”

I’m happy that the city has decided if the gun is pointed directly to its temples it will consider hiring Callahan to solve the problem. Good luck with that. Weasels are very slippery and it can be difficult to keep them in a corner.


Now for something you’ll really love! This picture was posted on a French friend’s FB page. In case you don’t recognize it right away that’s a hunting platform. It was posted with the brilliant epitaph:

Hunting regulates wildlife,
Wildlife regulates hunting. 

 

 

 

 


I had the MOST fun day yesterday playing with the amazing lyrics from Jerry Herman’s  Hello Dolly. This particular tune had escaped my attention but it impressed itself upon me again in the fine soundtrack of the Marvelous Mrs, Maisel. Here’s a reminder in case you need it.

The necessary changes had to be made.

It has always been a beaver who arranges things,
For the water, and protection, it derives
It has always been a beaver who arranges things
Like watersheds, and habitats and lives.

 

Now for the fun part.

If you want your floods prevented, drought and fires circumvented,
Just leave everything to me.
If you want your salmon guarded, fish restored or blight bombarded
Just leave everything to me.
Get diversity explosion,  treat nitrates or block erosion
Keep pollution from the sea
If you want your wells to deepen, carbon sunk or frogs a leapin’
My system will ecoengineer those systems
Just leave everything to me.

You can see these versus practically write themselves can’t you? Oh where is Barbara when we need her!

If you want your otters fatter, orcas fed and rivers matter
Just leave everything to me.
If you want mosquitos eaten, bats in flight and dead zones beaten
Just leave everything to me
If you want more ducks for hunting, migratory birds and bunting
They’re my friends as  you will see
If you want to save the planet, let me do what I can dammit.
My system will ecoengineer those systems
Just leave everything to me.
 


If you want to help the critters, mink and muskrat and their litters
Just leave everything to me.
If you want your greenbelt living, species boom and plants forgiving,
Just leave everything to me.
If you want your treeline greener, natives lush or wastewood leaner
Just leave everything to me.
If you want your trout kept coolly, streams undried and creeks unruly
I’ll discretely use my own discretion
I’ll arrange for making all arrangements
I’ll proceed to plan the whole procedure
Just leave everything to me.


I’m sure you’ve read something about the EPA’s new rule rolling back  restrictions of the clean water act. Millions of streams, headwaters and wetlands that were once protected from pollution will now be accessible to all forms of devastation. It’s part of Mr. Trump’s fervent campaign to undo everything Obama did. And boy is he dedicated to his cause.

EPA final rule unravels Clean Water Act protections 

The Environmental Protection Agency announced today it is finalizing a rule that will drop protections for millions of miles of streams and millions of acres of wetlands, putting watersheds at risk for countless Americans.

The revised rule announced Thursday states that ephemeral bodies of water — those that form only after rainfall or that flow only part of the year and dry up at other times — are among those that are not subject to federal control. This exception also applies to waste treatment systems, groundwater, prior converted cropland and farm watering ponds.

It also identifies four categories that are federally regulated under the Clean Water Act: large navigable waters such as the Mississippi River, tributaries, lakes and ponds, and major wetlands.

Hear that? The only water we need to protect is water we can SAIL on. I.E. that people might see. Shipping water. Not drinking water. And if you think Trump is especially evil think again because this is EXACTLY what the Bush administration did before Obama came along.

Despite prior reports, there are no data or tools that can accurately map or quantify the scope of “waters of the United States.” This is the case today, and it was the case in 2014 when the Obama Administration issued its blog titled “Mapping the Truth.” Therefore, any assertions attempting to quantify changes in the scope of waters based on these data sets are far too inaccurate and speculative to be meaningful. While this Administration agrees that the current data and tools are insufficient, we are committed to supporting the development and improvement of the technology needed to map the nation’s aquatic resources.

Water can go EVERYWHERE if it floods right? So there’s no real way to say where a stream should be. I mean your house could be in the middle of a stream if we keep releasing carbon. So lets not quibble about “Is it a stream” or “Isn’t it a stream“. Lets just say once it gets navigable it matters.

You can thank Justice Scalia for pointing us towards this dark place before his death. Well, Scalia and Trump.

On February 28, 2017, the President signed the “Executive Order on Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.” The E.O. calls on the EPA Administrator and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works to review the final 2015 Rule and “publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the rule….” The E.O. directs that the EPA and the Department of Army “shall consider interpreting the term ‘navigable waters’” in a manner “consistent with Justice Scalia’s opinion” in Rapanos v. United States (2006).

Rapano?

The Supreme Court split 4-1-4 on Rapanos, a case brought by a Michigan landowner who was blocked from developing a property that had been designated a wetland. Writing for the four conservative justices, Scalia said only waterways and wetlands with “relatively permanent” surface water connections to larger waterways should be regulated under the Clean Water Act.

But Kennedy — then the court’s swing vote — drew up his own regulatory test, arguing that streams and wetlands should be protected if they have chemical, biological or hydrological connections to waterways. That test — which he called a “significant nexus” — became the defining characteristic of his opinion.

Kennedy was right. But Kennedy is gone, sipping whiskey on the back porch of his grandaughter’s birthday party. And the criminals have taken over the grocery store and the bank and the police station. Now officially ZERO waterways are connected to any other waterways. And we can dump pollution anywhere we want except a handful of rivers. Beginnings are unimportant and it doesn’t matter until you get to the end.

America voted for this.


Have you ever noticed how people complain about beavers until they want something from them? Yes, we noticed that too. It’s like that annoying roommate you had in college who always talked smack about you and hung out with her other buds until she needed help with her latin paper and ooh then she was your BEST friend ever.

England is doing that with beavers and flooding lately.

Beavers in Gloucestershire’s Forest of Dean ‘settling in well’

A second pair of beavers released in the Forest of Dean as part of a scheme to tackle flood risk are said to be settling in well – and building dams.

The beavers replaced a pair introduced in 2018, the first in Gloucestershire for 400 years, as part of a wider plan to return the animal to the UK’s wild.

But they had to to be trapped and moved after seven months when one was found to have tapeworm, a parasitic disease.

The new pair took their place at the same site near Lydbrook in the autumn.

Beavers were hunted to extinction in the UK in the 16th Century. But efforts have been made to reintroduce them to the wild in areas including Somerset, Yorkshire and Cumbria, while they have also been living wild in areas around the River Tay in Scotland for some years since escaping or being illegally released some years ago.

Oooh sure. You probably GAVE them the tape worm in the first place. But sure get rid of those beavers and start over. How’s it going so far?

Forestry England said their replacements had been captured in Scotland, from different areas of the River Tay. It said the “necessary health checks” had been carried out and the female had been released in the autumn followed by the male a few weeks later.

Rebecca Wilson, from Forestry England, said cameras at the site showed the beavers were “dam building and tree felling” and had “settled in well”.

“Nocturnal dam building is creating deep pools of water, slowing the brook’s flow,” she said. “The tree felling followed by coppicing trees will bring benefits for a variety of wildlife that depends upon more complex habitats.”

Well sure. Now that you have some do-over beavers let them get to work. I’m so old I can remember when a servant or pet got a tape worm you treated him with 9.99 worth of pills instead of killed and replaced. But what do I know?

It is hoped the animals will help prevent flooding in the area by improving biodiversity and building dams and ponds.

The authority said it would be monitoring the “hydrological and ecological changes” the beavers make.

As in, none of the kids really like Martin, and we never, ever play with him. But we invited him to Scott’s birthday party because “It was hoped he would bring his complete set of Pokeman cards” which everyone wants.

Good luck, beavers.


There are plenty of perfectly reasonable choices. Sides streams of the Thames, the Trent. the Severn. The Witham, the Avon, the Dee. But you had to pick the Otter. And you didn’t think that might cause a problem down the line?

The other day I was forwarded of an email from Megan at the River Otter Ecology Project. Seems a film crew had contacted her about wanting to do a segment on the beavers. She was rightly confused. So of course sent it to me thinking they had mixed up our names.

I realized right away that this email was, in fact, intended for NEITHER of us. But rather for the good folks on the River Otter working with Beavers. In Devon. They accidentally contacted the River Otter ecology Project when they wanted the beaver project on the river otter! So I contacted the producer and introduced them to Mark Elliot and the good folks at The Devon Land Trust beaver project. And they arranged with each other to set up an interview for valentine’s day.

You’re Welcome.

But if there wasn’t a Heidi who weirdly happened to know the woman saving otters in Marin and the people saving beavers in Devon, this might have never worked itself out. Think of it! The good people England might not get to watch a short segment about how beavers mate for life and prevent flooding on valentine’s day.

See what a bad idea it was to move famous beavers in to the river otter?

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!