When the beaver revolution finally comes to Texas – and mark my words, it will come – it will be to somewhere like Tyler, where we already met at least two unrelated stories about women trying to save beavers on their little community lake. The first was Carmen Sosa, a staunch beaver defender that still donates to Worth A Dam every month, and the second is our new friend Brittany Poster Oak Hollow.
Residents speak out on beaver trapping in south Tyler neighborhood
TYLER, TX (KLTV) – Since the first of the year, beavers have been causing problems at a lake in the Oak Hollow neighborhood in south Tyler.
And they are taking care of it using a trapper hired by the property owner’s association through the property manageme
nt company.
Okay this you expect from Texas. But this next paragraph not so much.
“I just think there could be a peacful resolution for both the residents and the wildlife,” resident Brittany Poster said.Poster says while she understands the Beavers are a problem, she doesn’t agree with how that problem is being handled.
“The way that they were originally trapped is they just left them that way, “I felt that was both dangerous to the residents, our pets, and our children who use that lake. But it also seemed unfair to the beavers, who were just trying to make a home.”
Well said, Brittany, now if only there were a few more of you and a few less of these:
“We know it’s going to undermine the shoreline and they’re headed to the root system of the trees and we certainly don’t want to lose the trees,” resident Gene Shull said.
“We’re just really interested in protecting the lake and protecting our trees,” Shull said. “And we don’t want to be liable to misfortunes that we didn’t try and take care of.”
Game Warden Captain Quint Balkcom says that beavers can cause big problems and while they can be relocated, it’s not the best option.
Okay, saving beavers is never easy. It always takes more effort than you think you can spare. Step one is to talk to the media, which you’ve done. And step two is to UNION-IZE. Talk to your neighbors and that woman down the street who took your parking place, that nice mom with three little girls, and that english teacher you never liked. Find allies. All the allies, not just the ones who bring brownies to the meeting. Some of them will be flakes, some will be really annoying, and some will become your friends for life.
It takes a village to save a beaver. It really does. For some reason the voice of trapping is always louder than the other one. Even if it’s one against a dozen. You have to team up. Do everything at once. Fight the battle on many fronts. That’s what happens when you start a beaver-union.
“Lefty”, the Pokesberry creek beaver, had cautious observers last night. They noticed that he appears to use his hand – just not his arm. They are concerned about grooming – that makes sense – but hopefully he can persuade a family member to do that side – and the temperature stays mild – for the time being things seem stable, Stay tuned.
Meantime there’s a nice beaver article about restoring beavers for fish that deserves our attention. In Washington of course. It looks to be a re-work of the academy of sciences article but that’s just fine. Of course you already know who its by, right?
The sentiment that Castor canadensis is little more than a tree-felling, water-stealing, property-flooding pest is a common one. In 2017, trappers in Washington State killed 1,700 “nuisance” beavers, nearly 20 times more than were relocated alive. In neighboring Oregon, the herbivorous rodents are classified as predators, logic and biology notwithstanding. California considers them a “detrimental species.” Last year alone, the U.S. Department of Agriculture eliminated more than 23,000 conflict-causing beavers nationwide.
Running countercurrent to this carnage is another trend: the rise of the Beaver Believer. Across North America, many scientists and land managers are discovering that, far from being forces of destruction, beavers can serve as agents of water conservation, habitat creation, and stream restoration. In Maryland, ecologists are promoting beaver-built wetlands to filter out agricultural pollutants and improve water quality in Chesapeake Bay. In North Carolina, biologists are building beaver-like dams to enhance wet meadows for endangered butterflies. In England, conservationists have reintroduced the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) in hopes that their pond complexes will attenuate destructive floods. And in Washington, where a century of habitat loss has devastated salmon, the Tulalip Tribes are strategically dispatching beavers to support the fish so integral to their history and culture.
Where there’s a beaver there’s a believer, I always say! Our favorite thing EVER is for beavers to go where they choose and people adapt, but this ain’t bad either.
That beavers benefit salmon is, in some quarters, a provocative claim. Many biologists historically regarded beaver dams as stream-choking barriers to fish passage. In the 1970s, Washington, Oregon, and California even passed laws mandating the removal of in-stream wood, beaver dams included. More recently, a 2009 proposal funded by the Atlantic Salmon Conservation Foundation suggested eradicating beavers from 10 river systems on Prince Edward Island and employing trappers to enforce “beaver free zones” in others.
The notion of purging beaver dams to allow salmon to pass, however, doesn’t stand up to scientific scrutiny. One 2016 study documented individual salmonids traversing more than 200 beaver dams on their way to spawn in Oregon streams, suggesting that fish have little trouble negotiating the obstacles. Far from harming salmon, in fact, beavers create indispensable fish nurseries. By filling up ponds and digging canals, beavers engineer the deep pools, lazy side channels, and sluggish backwaters that baby salmon need to conserve energy and evade predators like great blue herons. Today, the National Marine Fisheries Service considers “encouraging formation of beaver dams” vital for recovering Oregon’s endangered coho populations.
Of course beavers are good for salmon. Remember that there used to be millions more of both species, and no one to rip out the dams. How do you think that ever happened?
“Beavers create complex habitat and enhance local biological diversity in a way that’s really unique,” says Michael Pollock, an ecosystems analyst at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who’s among the beaver movement’s grandfathers. “They do a much better job of managing these systems than we do.”
Well of course they do. It’s a long article with all kinds of awesome running through it. You might want to go see for yourself. I will just leave you with some pithy closing arguments.
While expanded ponds are beavers’ most visible hydrologic impact, their ability to recharge groundwater might be an even greater contribution. At the Tulalip’s relocation sites, Ben Dittbrenner has found that for every cubic meter (264 gallons) of surface water beavers impound, another 2.5 cubic meters (660 gallons) sinks into the earth. As that water trickles through the soil, it cools off, eventually reemerging to mingle with streamflows downriver. Elsewhere, such hyporheic exchange between surface- and groundwater keeps streams hydrated later into the dry season, turning seasonal creeks perennial. Dittbrenner’s research suggests that beaver-facilitated cooling and mixing also reduces water temperatures by more than 2 degrees Celsius (about 3.5 degrees Fahrenheit), a huge boon for heat-sensitive salmon and trout.
Although beavers won’t singlehandedly save us from climate change, such findings suggest they might be able to help our stressed water supplies adapt to a warmer future. “By 2100, we’re expecting to see snowpack, which is basically our water storage reservoir, disappear throughout a lot of the Cascades,” Dittbrenner says. “I’m curious whether beavers could make up an appreciable storage component of that lost snowpack.”
Ahh Ben! Whatever are we ever going to do without you? Be very, very sorry, that’s for sure. I found out recently that he won’t be able to make it to the festival this year because he’s going to be sent to South America to write about CAPYBARA fer crying out loud.
Regular readers of this website might remember the story of Nevers park in Connecticut, where there was a plan trap the beavers once the freeze unfroze. There was ample outcry on the ground and I thought there might be enough public support to change the outcome. This morning I read this from Steve of Ct.
Some local success in South Windsor, CT. After promising not to, our head of parks had traps set for our beavers in a local park. Someone posted that on Facebook, I snagged a town council member on the way to their meeting, after which the mayor called me at home and we talked. This morning he called again to say the traps were being removed and he was calling Mike Callahan to schedule an assessment. Not a bad way to start the day!!!
And thus begins another urban beaver success story, only this time they only had to call in the expert from 30 miles away not 3000. The joys of living on the east coast eh? I sense great things for the beavers in Nevers Park. Good luck team, you are in great hands.
I also received a worried message message from our beaver-watching buddies in North Carolina in Pokeberry Creek, Apparently one of the yearlings hasn’t been using his right front paw and they are wondering whether to involve a rehabber.
Yup it definitely looks like its hurting. I’m asking some rehab friends for advice. But it’s a big deal to trap and take it to be treated, and my friend Lisa reminds me that casting is really hard with an aquatic animal. Since its a front paw on a beaver – and not all that important – I’d be inclined to make sure it has plenty of food within swimming distance and wait. But what do I know so we’re asking the experts.
Meanwhile there’s strangely beautiful story out of Utah.
The land around Jeremy Ranch Elementary School will be getting a makeover in a few months as Summit County plans for a major construction project.
To accompany two roundabouts the county plans to construct in the spring, it will be restoring the wetlands around the elementary school and building a bike path for students. The Park City Board of Education approved the county’s Wetland Mitigation Plan and easements to create a new trail at its meeting last week.
Wonderful! Wetlands, elementary school, bike path, sounds perfect. What’s the weird part?
According to the county’s mitigation plans, it intends to reroute Toll Creek east of the culvert into a new channel. The county will then install beaver dams and berms and plant willow cuttings to slow down the stream so the wetlands can re-form. The idea is that flora and fauna that left the area when the wetlands dried up will return, Hauber said at the meeting.
“For the school, it gives an opportunity for outdoor science because they can go out and actually see a wetland,” Hauber said.
I”m thinking it’s time for another beaver hero article with good strong folks working to solve problems. Skip Lisle and Mike Callahan are both great, but they’re the old guard, bringing up the rear. Who’s new to the field and making waves?
For several years, wildlife biologist and Beaver State Wildlife Solutions owner Jakob Shockey has developed and implemented anti-lethal solutions to help property owners deal with beavers and the challenges they can present when they take up residence.
Shockey, who grew up on a farm in the Siskiyou Mountains, shared various ideas and solutions during his presentation “Resolving Conflicts with Beaver Using Natural Science and Design” at the Necanicum Watershed Council’s Listening to the Land event at Seaside Public Library on March 20.
Hurray for Jakob Shockley and Beaver State Wildlife Solutions! I remember the buzzing excitement of his recruit at the state of the beaver conference in 2013. Everyone was eager to see the torch being carried to the next generation and Jakob was more than up to the task. Plus we were grateful to finally have someone doing this work in Oregon.
Beavers can create problems for land owners in two primary ways: Building dams that block waterways and/or cause flooding, and tree mortality, or cutting down trees, in particular. To resolve these conflicts, land owners have a number of options, including trapping, relocating or killing them.
Shockey’s goal, however, is to help residents instead pursue predictive management, which includes working within the ecosystems of streams, rivers and wetlands and implementing long-term and cost-effective solutions that serve as alternatives to bullets and bait.
“If you’ve got beaver at your site, that means it is good beaver habitat,” he said. “If you open that niche up, there is going to be another population at some point. … You start getting on a treadmill of removal — doesn’t matter if it’s lethal removal or relocation. If you’re taking animals out of a territory that’s been deemed high-value by the animal, there are going to be more that come in.”
Well now doesn’t that sound reasonable? If a beaver is on your land it’s because it’s land that supports beavers. Killing one won’t solve your problem. Killing five won’t either. Identify the problem that needs solving and let the beaver stay like a kind of watch-beaver to keep others away.
When it comes to tree-cutting, Shockey said, effective solutions include surrounding the base and root collar with welded 2”-by-4” wire at least 30” inches above the ground and 24” above the snow line; and covering the surface of a tree base with a mixture of latex paint and clean, dry sand. For large areas, such as orchards or crop fields, land owners also can consider electric fences, as long as they maintain the vegetation beneath the fence.
To address flooding—the other primary conflict, which can cause impoundment and damage to urban infrastructure and cropland—Shockey suggests installing flow devices. They fall into three main categories: flexible pond levelers; trapezoidal culvert fences; and fence and pipe systems.
In all cases, the devices capitalize on natural science and beaver behavior to address potential negative ramifications of damming without relocating or harming wildlife. Shockey pointed out a potential issue with flow devices is property owners can be held liable if they alter a beaver dam and it causes flooding on neighboring property.
What a fantastic article. Jakob must be very good at explaining his case to reporters because the writer has picked up all the salient points. Use natural science to take on beavers, and get Jakob on your side!
The endeavor is worthwhile, in Shockey’s estimation, because beavers are a keystone species in the Pacific Northwest. Their dams create wetland ecosystems that provide nesting sites for birds and increase fish and waterfowl populations.
“There is a myriad of animals that depend on the systems the beavers build,” he said. With beaver being an animal whose presence is quantifiably proven to increase water supplies, suitable habitat and fish populations, he added, a question to ask is, “How can we kind of get out of their way and let that happen?”
WONDERFUL! We here at Worth A Dam are all about getting out of a beavers way. They bring benefits we just can’t and they do it for free. If we can let them do their job we will be the happier for it. I believe I said something like that myself.
Well, Mike Callahan confirms he did, in fact, do a training for the staff in London Ontario a few years back, but he has no speculation on the flow device where the outtake pipe goes uphill. Our filmmaker friend from Windswept, Doug Knutson says that London is the wildlife management ideal they’re working for in his city and shares this report. You can tell by the nutria on the over photo that Belleville has a long way to go.
City council had called for a new policy, following an incident last fall, when residents in the east end rescued a beaver caught in a trap and drowning. The policy presented to council by staff this week included rules that live traps should be used as a first step, and killing traps only as a last resort.
In public areas traps would be set in the evening and removed in early morning to avoid danger to the public and pets. The proposed policy indicated that when animals are found in live traps, they are to be humanely euthanized.
Did you catch that? Our old policy is that beavers would be trapped. But our new one is that beavers can either be trapped and killed right away or trapped and killed later. The timing changes. The killing, you see, does not. In addition the city will remove the traps in the morning and post signs to warn residents.
Mighty white of you, says every beaver, ever.
This just isn’t good enough for Doug, who is still pushing for better options.
So the city will agree to take care of resident’s delicate fee-fees, but what about using a flow device or solving the problem without killing?
The city would evaluate the area for potential options such as Beaver Baffler or Beaver Cone, prior to any trapping activity. Councillor Kelly McCaw said she couldn’t support it, adding “We are a friendly city and shouldn’t be killing our way out of a situation.”
That’s the best part of the article. We love Kelly. There’s a scene in Hamlet where he’s trying to pry information out of his school friends that have been warned by his parents not to cooperate. He innately senses that one of them is about to crack and zeroes in on that guy.
Hamlet: Be even and direct with me whether you were sent for or no. Rosencrantz: (to his friend) What say you? Hamlet: Nay, then I have an eye of you – if you love me hold not off!
And in my mind, even now, this phrase springs into my mind when I think I have found the proverbial weak link in the chain, and thus the way in. As I believe Doug very clearly has found with Ms. Kelly McGraw. I would stick by her side and feed her all the information she needs and maybe throw in some very cute photos of beavers as well. Maybe some kids drawings beavers too. You are welcome to any of ours.
Doug has bravely moved the train from “We’ll kill beavers whenever we like” up the tracks to “We’ll be thoughtful about public impact when killing beavers.” Which is hard to do. But if you want to force it to the next station, which is the hardest part of the climb, I would stay close to Kelly.
Because it all starts with a willingness to think that killing isn’t right and there should be a better way. And where it goes from there is up to people like us.