Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Month: March 2017


I know it’s not Sunday but there’s plenty of good beaver news to go around. Starting with this article from Muskoka in Ontario, Canada. It is nicely written by Andrew Hind, who obviously has come to appreciate our flat-tailed friend.

Muskoka beavers build a healthier environment

Despite being a Canadian icon and a symbol of industriousness, many people view the beaver as a nuisance animal, blaming them for flooding and for damaging property through the felling of trees. Any derision towards the beaver, which generally is misplaced and based more upon myth than reality, masks the absolutely vital role beavers plays in creating a healthy environment – especially in areas with lots of wilderness and wildlife, like Muskoka. 

Beavers spend much of their life building and maintaining dams that hold back the water and create the ponds in which they live. What most people fail to realize is that the beaver is not the only one to benefit from the habitat it creates.  

The contributions made by beavers, perhaps nature’s most industrious animals, are more profound than most people realize. They are not the nuisance they are so often made out to be, but rather our partners in preserving the health of our planet Earth.BEAVER_chews-b2-Robin_Tapley___Gallery

“The beaver is the largest rodent in North America and it has been commonly known as ‘nature’s-engineers’ because of what they do for the environment,” explains Muskoka naturalist Robin Tapley. “A beaver is the only other mammal besides man that alters its environment to suit its living requirements. However, in the case of the beaver, its contribution has a positive impact on the local flora and fauna and this greatly increases the biodiversity in an ever-shrinking natural world. Science has demonstrated that the result of a single dam has increased the number of birds, reptiles, mammals as large as deer and bears, and plant life in areas modified by beavers.”  

Are you smiling yet? This is a ‘second cup of coffee’ kind of read and a great way to start the weekend.   What I love about an article like this is the fact that you can tell right away it’s going to be good. And you are just curious how good?

Dave McLachlin, a biologist for Ducks Unlimited, enthusiastically agrees. “Beavers are what we call a ‘keystone species. Without them we would witness a collapse of the ecosystem. The wetlands that beavers help create are the most productive environment we have in Canada.”

Beaver ponds not only create biodiversity, but also help with local flood control, reduction of water turbidity, the filtration of herbicides and pesticides, and – eventually – the creation of fertile bottomland.

To understand the importance of the beaver pond to the local system we need to understand more about the life cycle of these ponds. 

Some people view the appearance of a dam in a stream almost as a sign of rodent infestation, a nuisance that needs to be removed. Many even believe that the dam and the pond it creates will eventually lead to destructive flooding downstream. Tapley bristles at the notion that the appearance of a beaver dam is a blight on the environment.

“A beaver dam is a complex structure designed specifically to slow the flow of water in a stream that results in creating a pond or wetland. Unfortunately, in the eyes of humans, flooded lands and fallen trees (specifically aspens, which is the tree of choice for beavers) appear to be an attack on the land. However, this is far from reality. The stumps grow new shoots which are a favoured food of moose and white tail deer, snags or dead standing trees become prime nesting locations for cavity nesters, including woodpeckers, wood ducks and mergansers, and the resulting wetlands offer increased habitat for insects, amphibians and reptiles, osprey, blue herons, mind and more – in fact, 85 per cent of all North American fauna rely on wetlands,” he explains.

Beaver dams, he explains, do not cause flooding – just the opposite. They help control the flow of water in the surrounding area, facilitating flood control in times of high water and also help maintain a stable water table, making streams, ponds and marshes less vulnerable to drought.

Give it up for Dave from Ducks Unlimited! He clearly understand beaver benefits and the good they do. The article goes on to take a little detour from accuracy describing how the “male beavers disperse for long distances looking to start their own family”. (Which of course would never be possible for heterosexual beavers unless the females did it too.) But never mind that Dietland Muller Swarze wrote that beavers were very unusual in that the female disperers went farther than the males. (The only other animal where girls go farther is porcupines, which is just the kind of odd fact that stays in my brain.) Dave gets the important bits right on the money.

The sediment and debris captured within the pond settle to the bottom, making for better turbidity and allowing for a huge variety of protozoan and insect life. Turtles, fish, and bullfrogs and fish love these deeper waters. Larger snakes begin to arrive, taking advantage of the abundance of frogs. The grassy areas around the edges of the pond, meanwhile, make for ideal nesting habitat for waterfowl, such as ducks and Canada Geese. These same grassy areas are attractive to small rodents, which are in turn prey for marsh hawks and foxes. In just a short period of time an amazing diversity of wildlife calls the beaver pond home.

The heightened wildlife activity centred on the beaver pond confirms its importance in biodiversity and maintenance of wetlands. In fact, Ducks Unlimited, which has a mandate to protect duck populations, recognizes the value of working with beavers to restore wetlands and the symbiotic relationship between healthy duck and beaver populations. 

“The habitat resulting from beaver activity is tremendous. Not only do so many species depend on it for food, shelter and breeding grounds but research has shown that bacteria attracted to a mature beaver pond helps remove nutrients (phosphates and nitrates) contained in the runoff from nearby farms, making for cleaner water. Herbicides and pesticides are also removed in a similar way,” notes McLachlin. 

Beaver ponds are cyclical, however, and come and go. “Eventually the beavers move on and the dam breaks down, draining the water and leaving behind an extremely lush meadow and the cycle begins all over again,” explains Tapley. 

And yet the one-time pond continues to pay rich dividends for the environment. The meadow – its soil consisting of muck that sat submerged on the pond’s bottom – is rich in nutrients and provides fertile ground for seed blown upon the winds. As a result, it doesn’t take long before there is enough lush vegetation for deer to begin grazing. Tree seedlings soon take hold. In about 15 more years a beaver meadow has formed. If left undisturbed, the area is likely to once again play host to beavers once trees have matured to about 10 centimetres in diameter. 

Early Muskoka farmers appreciated the value of these rich bottomlands and cultivated them for raising crops. They reaped the bounty of more than a decade of labour by a colony of beavers. 

So not only do beavers benefit all that wildlife when they’re actually in residence, when the pond  silts up and is abandoned, the soil they leave behind is the rich loam farmers love best. And in between making ideal grow conditions and removing nitrogen beaver dams also prevent flooding. Are you sold yet? It’s wonderful to see an article like this appear out of nowhere. I usually hear something in the pipeline along the way, but this was a completely un-looked-for blessing. Go read the whole thing so Mr. Hind is reminded that folks care about beavers.


And late breaking I was just sent this by writer Ben Goldfarb who will  be meeting with doctoral student Dan Kotter in Yellowstone to discuss his research. Here’s what the trail cam picked up recently, and check out Mr. Wolf at .41. Those beavers do not even trouble their pretty little (dry!) heads about him.

Plenty to do! And they’re just the critter to do it!


Whadya know, the sanitation district decided to stop hanging up the phone on reporters and issue a statement. What are the odds? Of course no one can challenge whether the statement is true or not because there are no photos or evidence but hey, at least they bothered to say something, even if its a lie.

Sanitary District explains Striebel Pond beaver removal

MICHIGAN CITY — A social media uproar started recently when someone left a sign at Striebel Pond indicating the Michigan City Sanitation Department had trapped and killed a pair of beavers who had made a habitat there. 

Tuesday night, Sanitary District General Manager Michael Kuss issued a statement regarding the matter:

In early March, the district received reports from the Michigan City Police Department and concerned citizens that beavers were causing damage to Striebel Pond, which is a flood control facility whose proper operation is vital to preventing flooding in the southwest portions of Michigan City, according to the district’s release.

After an investigation, the district discovered that beavers had destroyed approximately 20 trees and built a dam, which was was affecting the proper operation of Striebel Pond. According to the district’s release, this was threatening to cause widespread flooding and damage to human health and the environment in that part of the city. The district decided it was necessary to remove the dam as well as the beavers.

The Indiana Department of Natural Resources consulted with the district and explained that beavers are considered a nuisance if they cause damage to public or private property or cause a threat to flooding. IDNR further said beavers rarely survive relocation.

On March 8, traps were set to capture the beavers, and two were captured, one on March 9 and the other on March 10. According to the district’s release, “the type of trap used to capture the beavers did not allow for live capture.”

After the beavers were captured, the dam was removed.

“The district understands that some members of our community are having difficulty accepting that beavers were removed in such a manner,” the release said. “Thus, while the IDNR and other naturalists say that it is difficult to relocate beavers, the district is willing to try and develop successful strategies for doing so in the future.”

The release went on to say that the district plans to replace the trees downed by the beavers, as they provide a canopy for the recreational area surrounding Striebel Pond. The district is asking for volunteers to help with these efforts. Anyone interested can contact the Sanitary District at 874-7799.

Now that wasn’t so hard, was it? I mean it’s not like there were any challenges or follow-up questions to your excuses, were there? Just be thankful, for example, that I don’t live in Michigan City. Or you know I would have asked to see the 20 chewed stumps and asked to  see a photo of the ‘dam’ they were building, which since this is a pond not a stream, I’m SURE was a lodge and not a dam. Where they were hoping to raise a family before you changed all that.

But you are willing to do this differently next time so I only hope that someone who was upset about this did their homework and found out there were many ways to solve beaver problems besides trapping. Hopefully they will hold you to that promise and ask you to take some longer-term solutions next time.


OP1070278ne of my favorite all time moments at the “Great beaver meeting of 2007 ” was when a woman I don’t know was questioning then city manager Don Blumbaugh about flow devices. She mentioned that she had read they existed and asked why the staff report didn’t mention them. He waived his magical hand like city officials always do and said they “wouldn’t work in THIS case” and waited for her to give up, go away, and just roll over for his expertese. The wonderful woman, whom I will always love, stepped closer to the microphone in exasperation.

“But you KNEW about them? You knew about them and you didn’t put it in the report?”

Ahhh, there are few things in life I remember more fondly than his squirming red face as he pointed to the mayor and urged anxiously “Talk to him!” hoping to get her attention away because city managers just run things, they don’t answer questions. And of course the mayor stepped in and said something deflecty and truthless. But it was THAT moment. It was THAT moment things turned in our favor. The sharks were in the water and they weren’t going home without their supper. We knew we were going to win. When he retired a few months later he cited this meeting as one of the things that pushed him over the edge.

(The following year, working the farmer’s market, I found out from the city treasurer that she had happened to see a program about Skip Lisle when this was happening and had invited the entire city council and public works over to watch it. So they all knew about flow devices. They all knew there were options. They just didn’t like them.)

Which just goes to say that “Keep it up Michigan City. This is starting to sound like success.”

 

 

 


Let’s say, (and why not) that you’re a busy executive mommy searching frantically for your keys when you see them in the smeary hands of your toddler who is also wearing your shoes and pretending to talk on your cell phone. It’s not the child care you expected from your husband or nanny, but face it, it’s adorable. And you wind up smiling a little wider than you meant to.

That’s how I felt when I saw this story from Michigan city, Indiana.
ABC57 News – See the Difference Michiana

Community concerned after local beavers killed

Signs at a Michigan City pond read, “Trapped and Killed.”

They explain the fate of two beavers living in Streibel pond, after

a city department decided beavers were too much of a nuisance and took action.

But some people in town are upset, saying crews took it too far,and some even say its “inhumane.”

The Sanitary District’s foreman immediately hung up the phone after our reporter told him he was with ABC 57, we went to the DNR for an explanation.

If you take a walk along Striebel Pond in Michigan City, you’ll likely see signs that say, “The two beavers that lived here were trapped and KILLED.”

Ahh you plucky little Michigan city tykes! Never mind the fact that if every place beavers were killed bore a sign the state would be absolutely littered with them. The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. And this was a great one. I especially like the part where the news team called sanitation and they hung up. They aren’t exactly skilled at handling press inquiries.

“How? Why? Was there a full attempt at scaring these beavers to relocate? Or were they just trapped and immediately put down its senseless.”

To help answer those questions, ABC  57  stopped by the Department of Natural Resources in Michigan City.”

“Beavers for their homes like higher water so they’ll dam up the water, pack mud sticks in a certain area and it backs up that water,” said DNR Commander Shawn Brown.

Brown says the Sanitary District trapped and killed the beavers to prevent water levels from rising and flooding neighboring homes. Worley doesn’t deny the beaver nuisance but she says more humane measures should have been taken.

You hear that? Yes, beavers are a nuisance! But you should have ‘scared them first’ rather than killing them. Because you know how easily beavers give up on things, the big sissies. Forget what they do for wildlife and water storage and just scare them away with clown masks. Because that’s nicer.

This is the problem I have with the word HUMANE and its rugged misuse by wildlife advocates everywhere.  It bothered me when the city said the beavers were going to be “euthanized’ too. It’s not like they were in any pain. Personally It doesn’t really matter to me whether the beavers die humanely or INhumanely. Or whether you scare them away with tax returns.

I want them to stay and I want you to deal with it. Period.

Hopefully Michigan city residents will use the google to find about beavers and happen upon the story of a certain California town that didn’t kill them or scare them and was richly rewarded with better wildlife and a cleaner creek.

A girl can dream, can’t she?


One of the advantages of having ‘beaver buddies’ all over the world is that there is almost always someone on hand to help me get the things I cannot reach. Like this, intriguing headline that requires a paid subscription or a passport to unravel. Fortunately for me, Chris Brooke of the Save the Free Beavers of the Tay FB group leaped to the rescue:

CaptureBeaver fever proves giant rodents are not a dam nuisance

CaptureIt is a wonder that anyone wants to reintroduce beavers almost 400 years after they were hunted to extinction. They sound like a farmer’s nightmare, creating soggy fields, rotten trees and pools of standing water, and infuriate anglers, as their dams are believed to hinder fish migration.

Yet a study into their effect on flooding on a farm in Devon has led to “beaver fever”, a clamour for more, not fewer, of the huge rodents and similar trials across England.

Beavers’ dams control the flow of water after rain and act as natural filters of chemical fertilisers that run off fields. In summer they also stop streams drying up, according to researchers at Exeter University, while coppicing trees creates a patchwork of different habitats that has increased the range of plants and wild animals.

Ooh I’m liking the way this is going. Time for coffee and a comfortable chair while I explore further. Mind you, this is the largest selling ‘respectable paper’ in ALL of the UK, so I think there are going to be folks paying attention. Including all the magistrates, farmers and anglers.

Richard Brazier, who led the initial research, has been asked to carry out six feasibility studies for beaver projects in Dorset, Gloucestershire, Devon and Cornwall. “The science suggests it would benefit society to have beavers in the landscape,” he said.

Naturalists in Wales have applied for permits to release ten pairs in Carmathanshire, while beavers in Scotland have been granted native species status after similar trials in Argyll.

In Devon, the beavers built 13 dams on a 180m stretch of stream inside an enclosure. Water flowing out had 30 per cent less nitrogen than water flowing in, almost 70 per cent less sediment and 80 percent less phosphates.

“Fertiliser getting washed out of soils is a huge problem worldwide,” Professor Brazier said. “It leads to algal blooms that starve the water of oxygen, which leads to fish deaths. It’s one of the reasons we have to treat our drinking water.”

If the difficult beavers of South America are the nagging critical aunt of the beaver world who’s petty complaints you just can’t escape, the epic “TO BEAVER OR NOT TO BEAVER” struggle of the UK is that glowing fountain of praise from your indulgent grandmother. I love hearing them argue about this over and over again because they are repeating the pro’s with a megaphone on an international scale. I don’t want them to ever stop, because who will take their place?

The government has promised £2.5 billion for improved flood defences, including £15 million for natural flood management such as planting trees and adding bends to rivers which have been artificially straightened.

“Most of the money is being spent on concrete,” said Chris Jones, a farmer, who is planning to release beavers upstream of Ladock, in Cornwall, a village that was flooded twice in 2012. “We need our land to store more water, so we don’t have these massive pulses of water after every heavy rainfall.”

Not everybody is a fan of the animals, which can grow to 25kg. A spokesman for the Angling Trust criticised “adding more barriers to fish migration”, while the NFU opposes beaver reintroductions because of “damage to farmland … and the risks of them spreading disease”.

Mark Elliott, of Devon Wildlife Trust, said that farmers’ “biggest concern is that beavers will become a protected species. If they are going to be accepted by landowners, there have to be clear mechanisms for managing the conflicts [between the two].”

Really Mark? Is that really your ‘biggest concern’? That beavers will be protected? Wouldn’t a bigger concern be that there wouldn’t be beavers at all? Or that all your rivers will dry up and that global warming will make it too arid to have them there anyway? Or that Theresa May will turn out to be exactly like Trump. How could the protection of beavers be your BIGGEST concern?

Okay, I’ll give Mark a break. Maybe that was a misquote or taken out of context. Maybe you’re having an off day or your cat is in the vet. It’s mostly a wonderful article. And I’m still very happy about it.  We all should be!

 


Now call me petty, but I’m just curious how many times Martinez has been on the front page of the Sunday Times without beavers? You have to admit we looked lovely spread across the front page without a bus accident or a shell explosion. That timeline in the margin was a fun creative writing project. (Of course the mother and kits didn’t come to Martinez before the father because that would be silly.) But never mind, my mother got phone calls. it was seen far and wide and I even got a note from Brock about it!

One oddly irksome response was an email sent to the website from a times reader in Pleasanton who said that she had just returned from a trip to South America were beavers were wreaking havoc and destroying trees because they have no predators. She wanted us to know that even though they’re cute they can be horribly destructive and Martinez should watch out.

No, seriously.

Honestly, I’m so sick of the Patagonia beavers. They are just gumming up the press and confusing folks even more. They should never have been there in the first place. Some greedy Nazi made a tremendously selfish choice and in addition to hurting beavers, he hurt his entire hemisphere. I can’t understand why trapping, eating, or predating by caymen’s and maned wolves haven’t got rid of them already, and they’re just making people think that all the horrible things everyone believed about beavers are true. Introduce some kind of immunocontraceptive and lets get OVER it already.

Sheesh.

fro at workAnyway, meanwhile back at the ranch I’ve been bracing myself for the idea that we might not get our stalwart artist at the beaver festival this year. The beloved FRO just found out that her life partner has major health issues and in addition to being terrified she is absorbed with caring for him. As they found each other rather late in life and are blissfully happy so it’s rotten timing, but I guess it always is. It’s truly hard to imagine having a beaver festival without FRO, but I’ve been trying to think of activities that are more ‘crafty’ than arty, so that the show can go on. In the mean time send healing thoughts and prayers her way, because honestly, the Martinez Beaver story would never have lasted 10 years without FRO.

Looking at our mountains of leatherette still waiting to be cut into tails, and thinking with our artists about the wildlife tattoos we have commissioned this year, gave me the idea of making nature journals instead of beaver tails. I was delighted to find this description on the Great Stems blog. Kids would still learn about the wildlife and gather the tattoos then have help placing them on the journal cover before making a nature journal to go inside. This illustration pretty much clinched it for me because I instantly imagined the stick as a beaver chew, for obvious reasons.

The binding really impressed me. You punch 2 holes in the cover and paper and then use a simple rubber band around each stick end by passing it through the holes. It keeps the book firm and allows it to open so you can sketch or record your thoughts. I just had to try one and see. One of the things we have infinite access to is downed wood, and we have had 10 years of learning how to make beaver chews so it’s an obvious fit. I don’t have any tattoos yet, so I used an old die-cut I had laying around from my scrapbooking days. The pleather is a buckskin tan and for this one I used an old twig pencil we had lying around from a former earth day activity. What do you think?

beaver journal

Jack LawsNot just a project but a way of re-learning to see! I’m liking this idea, and if Jon doesn’t have anything to lead tours to, he’d be a great Fro-stand in! Of course nothing can place the actual FRO, who is still in all our thoughts and prayers, but this could be a cool fill-in.  You may remember we’ve already had the most famous nature journal-er of all come right here and sketch our beavers for Bay Nature. What a night, eh?


DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!