Month: September 2011
Let’s say (and why not?) that you were a strapping young lad on the East Coast with a comfortable government job counting the problems wildlife cause and instructing people to kill beavers, coyotes and starlings, (to name a few). You go to meetings, do some field work, carry a firearm, make eyes at the more attractive interns and go out after work for a cold one with your friends. Considering you stopped college after the bachelor’s you make pretty decent money. You can’t complain. Life is good.
You stop working for US FWS in 2008, I’m assuming because the economy tanks and suddenly Uncle Sam isn’t such a reliable employer anymore. I’m guessing you were laid off and the promised pension you were counting on starts to dissolve like cotton candy. You’re on your own, without work or potential work, and a critical voice might say your skill set could barely fill up a cocktail napkin. What do you do?
Now this is all speculation here, but I’m guessing you do what you always did. You kill beavers, of course! Only for some strange reason business in Massachusetts isn’t what it once was. Seems folks aren’t hiring you to kill beavers the way you expected them too. Even though your watershed experience at FWS connected you with all the right folk. It can’t be your fault. It can’t be that they’re hiring someone else to do that work.
IT MUST BE THE ANIMAL-LOVERS!!!!!!!!
See, back when you were graduating your state passed a law that said basically that an animal’s right to die without pain and torture was more important than a trappers right not to be slightly inconvenienced. Bummer. Trapping was of course still allowed – just not with the old tools unless there was some kind of imagined threat involved to human welfare, or roads, or water supplies, (well – it was mostly still allowed but not as allowed as it used to be). As a former employee for US FWS you knew that meant only one thing, crazy breeding wildlife with beavers everywhere and no work for you.
You’re 42, a bright lad, and not one to give up easily. You start a club to lobby politicians to go back to the old ways! You have paid close attention to the Bush administration’s talent for “opposite naming” (Clean water act, for example). It was good enough for the president so you employ the same technique for your club and choose a name that implies stewardship and animal husbandry, toying briefly with the intention of becoming a licensed non-profit.
Committee for Responsible Wildlife Management
(Note – you could have used Responsible Animal Management instead of Wildlife, but then your acronym would have been CRAM and that’s problematic – you’re no fool.)
So CRWM pleads and pushes and lobbies and wheedles and deals and nudges the trapping issue into the legislative chamber. And those crazy animal lovers at MSPCA keep pushing back with their videos and letter whining. You take your skill for turning a phrase on its head and write a few articles on maintaining animal welfare through careful trapping, highway workers and city employees (who long for nothing more than to appear to care about wildlife while still killing it when it gets in their way) eat it up. You’re a hero. Politicians flock to you. You are at the state house more often than Tip O’Neil.
You come “this close” to overturning the law each time, but you never give up. Now you’re at it again with HB2001 which basically inserts text into the old bill saying that no one can use those bad traps except you and your friends and everyone who asks.
The above provision shall not apply to the use of prohibited devices by federal and state departments of health, wildlife management agencies, or divisions or municipal boards of health for the purpose of protection from threats to human health and safety or for the management of furbearing wildlife during their established regulated seasons. The uses of prohibited devices are subject to the regulations and restrictions promulgated by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife.
This time you may have found the right girl for the job – (I’ve been told women are always easier to convince that their poodles are in danger if strong trappers don’t get the bad coyotes). Representative Anne Gobi is a democrat and the chair of the joint committee on natural resources and agriculture. This comes to the floor soon, and you can bet you’ll be there, making faces at the Bunny-Huggers, shaking heads and scaring babies.
This is certain to happen, its practically a done deal – unless – unless – unless – one of those crazy animal people get in your way. Unless someone gets the ear of Anne before you do and lets the BIG OL’ SECRET cat outta the bag. As long as no one passes it along, you’re home free. What a are the odds? The white-hats keep marching to the capital but they never say anything but “be nice” and “animals are people too”.
They never say that it’s a lie.
A Big Lie.
They never say that the only reason you’re there in the first place is because you want a job.
They never say that a simple meta-analysis comparing news articles about beavers in MA to four other states of similar size and water acreage without trapping bans would prove that there are no more beavers or beaver complaints than there have ever been since 1996. No more than there are in states where they kill them however they like, anyway, considering normal population growth. The truth is that the change in law didn’t mean that folks stopped killing beavers.
It just mean that they stopped paying trappers to do it.
Like the landscaper whose leaf blower runs out of gas, the brick layer who drops his trowl, or the widow who relies on her trusty vibrator: they simply take matters into their own hands.
It’s a good thing no one is going to tell Anne before this bill comes to the floor. Soon it will pass and the whole “be nice to beavers” BS will be over. Then you can go back to paid work, instead of begging for crumbs on the internet. Heck maybe you can even prevent laws like this from getting any traction in other areas. Then you can work all over the East Coast!
And if it doesn’t pan out, don’t worry. You can always move to California. They let you kill beavers any old way out here.
Meet Glenn S. Stillman. He’s 57, a farmer and a former selectman (which in massachusetts is like a member of city council). His farm was just voted to grow the best tomatoes in the region and his wife is the local conservation chair. Last week he was arrested for using his backhoe to repair the damage the city’s backhoe did to a beaver dam. Apparently the highway workers were afraid that the pond would flood the road. The pond is on Mr. Stillman’s property. The Dam is on Mr. Stillman’s property.
The road is not.
NEW BRAINTREE — A former selectman trying to save a beaver pond is facing assault charges.
Glenn S. Stillman, 57, was arrested on charges of assault and disorderly conduct after he allegedly had an angry confrontation with a highway worker who was removing part of a beaver dam in order to clear water off Barre Cutoff Road during the Sunday storm.
Mr. Stillman, of 1205 Barre Cutoff Road, allegedly shouted at the worker, then used a tractor to undo the work that the man had done to try to stop flooding on the road. Mr. Stillman, a well-known local farmer, was released on $250 bail at his arraignment yesterday in Western Worcester District Court in East Brookfield.
I love this story more than any I’ve read all year. I well remember how many citizens of Martinez (respectable and not-so-respectable) glowered (or worse) at city staff when they were taking out the dam or threatening to. I remember the man who sat on the dam and the police who dragged him off. Mr. Stillman is accused of threatening the highway hero inside the backhoe, but honestly I can only wonder. Once at a city council meeting our head of public works refused to stay in the room because he said my husband scowled at him from three rows away. (Having survived a quarter of a century with intermittent exposure to such scowls I can only imagine that road workers may be somewhat differently-skinned.)
But the law is the law. Mr. Stillman was arrested and released on bail and must tell his story to the judge next week. In the mean time I immediately wrote Mr. Stillman with praise for his courage and then wrote Beaver Solutions Mike Callahan to tell him to make friends as quickly as possible. He assured me he was already scheduled to meet with the Stillman’s next week and do some site assessments. I invited the former selectman to guest blog should he wish to tell his side of the story, but after his court date he may be tied up with book signings and movie deals.
Beaver support this week from Farmers AND Ranchers! What is the world coming to?
This morning I arrived WAY TOO EARLY to see our beavers and was greeted with a black feathered shadow on the dam. (Ohh so that’s why they’re called night herons!) Jon saw two yesterday morning, one on each dam. When the sun came up the night heron slipped away and was replaced by the usual green heron. I was able to film this.

Lookee what I got yesterday when I helped Sherri start up a facebook page! (Go friend her so she gets practice.) She wants a beautiful website like ours and is looking for some hardy souls to help her. I told her I would put out the APB, but in the meantime she could make things work with FB. This article was just published about her involvement with Estes Valley and apparently another big one is on the way.
Stan Gengler, executive director of the Estes Valley Recreation and Parks District (EVRPD), told the gathered citizens at the town board room on Friday that he wanted to hear everyone’s thoughts and concerns and that the meeting provided a great opportunity to talk about the assets of the trails and the beaver ponds. He assured worried citizens that the EVRPD doesn’t want to get rid of the beaver dam and doesn’t want the beavers to move. They are an environmental asset, he said, to applause.
“I hope we (can) come together and find the best alternative for constructing a trail, as well as for preserving the beaver habitat,” he said. “We’re not bulldozing the beaver ponds.”
Now this sounds like a community that appreciates beavers! Everyone’s suggestions were heard at the meeting, including the one to make the trail into a catwalk and the one to make the whole path cantalever! Sherri of course offered real alternatives, and I’m sure they’ll get it all figured out soon.
Tippie said that the problem with removing the dam is that engineers would have to go deep — it’s not just a matter of “taking out the sticks at the top.” That would lead to draining the pond, which is not as easy for the beavers to build back. Beavers, themselves, act as flood-control engineers, she added. They shouldn’t be relocated and have had enough harassment already, she said.
“If people don’t like beavers, they don’t know anything about them,” she said. “They are a keystone species, providing habitat for wildlife and stimulating growth of trees. This is an incredible opportunity. It can be a win/win, with a plan to make as minimal impact on the dam as possible….People are coming here to enjoy the wildlife. We have to plan around them….You have to have a soft touch, anytime you do anything with the earth. Bulldozers scare the snot out of me.”
Just a final note, when I was chatting with the filmaker yesterday about who she had talked to and who should be next, I asked about Sherri. She laughed, “Are you kidding? She was amazing, girlfriend!”.(Sherri often expresses her affection for friends by calling them “girlfriend”). I guess this impersonation was proof that they had chatted!
(I wonder how she’ll imitate me?)
You can read the whole delightful article article here.
Update from Skip: Now we’re heard from all out beaver friends post-Irene
We’re fine. Thanks. On high ground. The state got devastated though.
All of our b-dams held, absorbing enormous amounts of water, and taking the edge off below. All flow devices are fine, and many acted as debris catches, protecting culverts from clogging, and hence the roads.
Cheers, Skip