Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

THE SMITHSONIAN HAS LOST ALL FACULTIES OF REASON: ARCTIC BEAVERS


Have you a daughter?
I have my lord.
Let her not walk in the sun. Conception is a blessing but as your daughter may conceive, Look to’t.

Hamlet II:2
 

Will somebody please put a wet blanket over this story once and for all? Or find the NOAA scientist that spawned it and send him on a one way trip to Jamaica? You would think that Chevron drilling holes in the ice and driving huge trucks back and forth across the permafrost would get an occasional mention, but obviously the BEAVER CALAMITY is taking up all the bandwith.

After all, there are only so many pages in a magazine like the Smithsonian.

Beavers Are Reshaping the Arctic Tundra. Here’s Why Scientists Are Concerned

Beavers have the ability to completely transform landscapes. They gnaw through trees, build dams and flood new areas to create ponds, earning them the title of “ecosystem engineers.” But a northward migration of these bucktoothed builders has scientists concerned, Hannah Osborne reports for Newsweek.

A new report about beavers is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) annual Arctic Report Card. By comparing decades-old aerial images of a region in western Alaska with newer ones, researchers found the number of ponds created by beavers has doubled in the last 20 years. They found more than 12,000 ponds; in that same area in 1955, there wasn’t a single one, Alexandra Larkin reports for CBS.

Hey what a coincidence! Researchers counted the number of beaver ponds in 1955 in Martinez and there were zero too!!! And Fairfield. And the Klamath. I bet you could go back all the way to 1905 and find zero beavers on the Mississippi. Whoa.

You don’t think that has anything to do with the fur trade do you?

There are areas of Alaska that had no evidence of beavers 50 years ago that are now apparently saturated with them,” he says. “It’s just a matter of time before they head even further north. When you consider this is likely happening across the rest of the Arctic in Canada and Russia, that gives you an idea of the scope of this change.”

Beavers can create shallow pools of water when they build dams. That has increased the total surface water in the region, raising concerns since these ponds are warmer than the surrounding ice, causing permafrost—the permanently frozen ground—to thaw out. Permafrost is a critical carbon sink, and its thawing releases carbon dioxide and methane that have been stored for years, Newsweek reports.

Gee you know what ELSE causes permafrost to melt? Lots and lots of green house gasses and a warming climate. Hey I wonder what those beavers are eating in that frozen north. Do you suppose they’re getting takeout? Does Gruphub deliver up there?  I mean if the ground were permanently frozen before they came there couldn’t be any willow growing there right? Hmm why didn’t they just starve?

“Those ponds absorb heat better, they change the hydrology of the area and the permafrost responds to that,” Tape tells the Guardian. “It’s accelerating the effects of climate change. When you realize what’s happened in western Alaska is likely to happen to northern Alaska, it does give you pause.”

There’s also an added concern about how the reshaped landscape and waterways will affect Indigenous communities in Alaska. Beaver dams could affect aquatic food webs and fish populations, as well as make boat access more difficult. More research is currently underway to parse through how the beavers will affect the ecosystem and Indigenous livelihoods, says Helen Wheeler, an ecologist at Anglia Ruskin University in England, in a statement

Ohh no no. Beavers making ponds melting the ice and reflecting more heat into the frozen ground. What are they even doing there? Just causing havoc?

It’s still unclear why the beavers are expanding northwards in the first place. It could be that the effects of a warming climate—such as more abundant vegetation—has made the region more habitable to beavers, the Guardian reports. 

It could also be a booming population of beavers expanding northwards to predator-free zones, or a combination of the two.

“[It] is not entirely clear, but we do know that beavers are having a significant impact on the ecosystems they are colonizing,” Wheeler says.

What ARE beavers doing there? That’s a fine question. Plotting world domination? Rubbing their little paws together as they advance their plan to destroy the planet?

I honestly can not believe that sentence was EVER PUBLISHED IN THE SMITHSONIAN. My forehead head literal hurts from hitting it so many times. You do understand that as the planet warms and the ice melts the treeline moves north which means the things that eat trees move north which means the things that eat BEAVERS move north. Right? You do understand how this basically works, right?

Have any Question or Comment?

3 comments on “THE SMITHSONIAN HAS LOST ALL FACULTIES OF REASON: ARCTIC BEAVERS

Ernie A Wisner

its the Smithsonian come on you cant seriously think they would support the natural world! they where literally built on removing it and putting it into a building behind glass so all you can do is look at it sealed up in little cubes. they think that “traditional range” means the rolling date instead of the actual traditional numbers. look at the reporting around salmon. traditional to them means 10 years ago they completely ignore pictures of the Umpqua river filled with fish bank to bank so thick you cant see the bottom and sailors reports that the milt coming out of the river stained the water in the pacific white for miles. expecting them to crack an eyelid to actually look at beaver ranges would put far to much strain on that one single braincell that thinks nature belongs in a terrarium. If a thing is not in a box they will report it as risky, this is the pattern they have followed for my 50 years and will probably follow till their funding stops coming from corporations and politicians that oppose nature rebounding and adapting. as a note Smithsonian is also one of the rags that always always reports how great dams are on our river systems instead of the damage they do. you can have the entire central valley of Washington and Oregon full to the brim with flood waters and Smithsonian will tell everyone how the dams are important for flood control.

heidi08

I at LEAST expect them to have an idea of what beavers EAT

Ernie A Wisner

lol but but but,,,, that would be Con-tro-ver-sial. it has long been known that smith’s makes editorial decisions that follow the funding and not the science. when they do publish the science it is no longer controversial so any new research is relegated to other places. Smiths is a serious notice that either you are so personally popular that they cant avoid publishing your work or you are so in the same rut as every researcher before you that you cant possibly hurt anyone’s feelings. dont get me wrong what it does it does well but i dont go to the Smithsonian if i want to see new or controversial research. LOL and i appreciate your comment a lot more since my field is botany.

Comments are closed for this post !!

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!