A weekend of wonders this father’s day, Here’s beaver news from about the maidu consortium, whose leader spoke at the beaver summit, SF Estuary magazine. Written by our friend Lisa Owens Viani.
Thinking Like Beaver to Aid Yellow Creek
Last fall, the Maidu Summit Consortium, a nonprofit composed of nine Mountain Maidu tribal member groups, installed 73 BDAs—beaver dam analogs—in Yellow Creek, a tributary to the North Fork Feather River and a state-listed heritage trout stream. Swift Water Design and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designed the structures, and Mountain Maidu tribal youth worked with Swift Water to build them. The idea behind the structures, which mimic beaver dams, is to slow erosion, catch sediment, and build up the river bottom to reverse the incised channel—without importing soil and other materials or emitting carbon from heavy, diesel-powered equipment.
BDA’s to the rescue. Let’s learn all about the work that beaver do for free!
In 2019, the 2,300-acre Humbug Valley, known as Tásmam Koyóm to the Maidu, was returned to the tribe as part of PG&E’s land divestiture resulting from their bankruptcy settlement. The tribe has been working to restore meadow and riparian ecosystems ever since. “We want to see more fish diversity, a more diverse ecosystem,” says Cunningham. “We miss the beaver, porcupine, and other animals that are important to the ecosystem. Compared to pond and plug, if you have beaver doing the work they can restore meadow systems, catch sediment, address head cuts, and stop incision just as good if not better than equipment.”
Much better, any stream will tell you. No diesel fumes and hazardous soil replacement. Only careful hand excavation any archeologist would prefer.
Kevin Swift, founder of Swift Water Design, led the team installing the BDAs in the first of what will be several phases. “It’s process-based restoration rather than using diesel and rock and insisting on imposing a form on the river,” he says. “Instead, we use the power the stream brings us and introduce materials that give the stream something to work with. Those structures drive channel evolution and add roughness and complexity—with a small bit of human nudging you can begin to correct structurally starved streams.”
You know Kevin was also a speaker at the California Beaver Summit. It’s almost like all the best people were gathered in one place by some unseen force.
Although the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will not allow people to bring beavers back to the site, the BDAs could attract the furry, long-toothed engineers, say Swift and other consortium members, who would love to see them return: there are beaver present in nearby tributaries, and cattle grazing has been discontinued since the Maidu took over land management, so there is now plenty of willow and other vegetation for beaver.
No of course they don’t. That would just be too damn logical. Much better to keep with the killing. Something they do understand,
Kate Lundquist, WATER Institute director with the Occidental Arts & Ecology Center (OAEC), who got involved in the BDA work through a grant from CDFW and developed a planning strategy for recruiting beaver, says, “We need to keep the ‘B’ in ‘BDAs.’ We want people to be doing instream structures, but we want to make sure people don’t forget the beaver. If you are building them in areas where you have beaver, they will manage and maintain the structures. Instead of being on the hook for maintenance, let the beavers do the work.”
Great point Kate. I couldn’t agree more. Although I personally might not have even said the B word. I might just have said, sure, if you know some other team of affordable engineers that live on site and make repairs every single day go ahead and use them.
If only the article had stopped there then there wouldn’t have been time for this.
Lundquist says that while some state officials have expressed doubt that beaver were native to the Sierra, she and OAEC co-director Brock Dolman have combed through historic accounts and found plenty of evidence of their presence, including a remnant dam carbon-dated to 1,270 years ago and an account from an older resident of the area who remembers a giant beaver dam and the best fishing of his life on a Yellow Creek tributary. “Tásmam Koyóm is ripe for beaver again,” says Lundquist.
Well. It is true Kate combed through accounts to find historic evidence. For the coastal paper which came later. Kate and Brock didn’t find a remnant beaver dam carbon dated 1300 years ago. That would be BLM archeolgist Chuck James. Kate isn’t listed as an author on either paper because we didn’t even meet her until the paper had already been submitted for publication. She was instrumental to the coastal paper which followed, In fact we might never have crossed paths with Dr. James if it weren’t for Barry Hill from the forest service hydrologist whom Cheryl met at the Flyway Festival in Vallejo who persuaded him to eventually give his original paper to Rick Lanman to rework. The rest is, as they say, is corrected beaver history,
Beaver failure is an orphan they say. But success has many parents. But it’s father’s day and to paraphrase Farley Mowat there are no orphans in beaver world. So enjoy this reminder.
[wonderplugin_video iframe=”https://youtu.be/EJ8LUhNC1IQ” lightbox=0 lightboxsize=1 lightboxwidth=960 lightboxheight=540 autoopen=0 autoopendelay=0 autoclose=0 lightboxtitle=”” lightboxgroup=”” lightboxshownavigation=0 showimage=”” lightboxoptions=”” videowidth=600 videoheight=400 keepaspectratio=1 autoplay=0 loop=0 videocss=”position:relative;display:block;background-color:#000;overflow:hidden;max-width:100%;margin:0 auto;” playbutton=”https://www.martinezbeavers.org/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wonderplugin-video-embed/engine/playvideo-64-64-0.png”]
