Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Tag: Martinez Gazette


This has been a very BEAVERY week in the news. Yesterday the Gazette chimed in.

 At Home With Vivian: Vintage Beavers do Shakespeare

Yay for the Beaver Festival! The annual festival will feature live music, children’s activities, beaver tours and more than 40 ecological booths. Beavers in down town Martinez? Of course. Martinez has something for everyone.

 According to my friend Wikipedia, “Now protected, the beaver have transformed Alhambra Creek from a trickle into multiple dams and beaver ponds, which in turn, led to the return of steelhead and North American river otter in 2008 and mink in 2009. The Martinez beavers probably originated from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta which once held the largest concentration of beaver in North America.”

Jeff and I enjoyed the Beaver Festival last year. There were lots of wildlife informational booths, many activities for children, and guided tours of the beaver habitat. It was a joyful place to be.

 So do something out of the ordinary. Come to the 8th annual Beaver Festival on Saturday, Aug. 1, 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., at Beaver Park (corner of Marina Vista and Castro streets). First 150 children attending will be able to collect 19 wildlife pins designed by Oakland artist Mark Poulin. The charms were purchased with a grant from the CCC Wildlife Commission. According to the Worth a Dam website (MartinezBeavers.org) “The activity will highlight the new wildlife seen in Alhambra Creek since the beavers arrived, and emphasize their role as a Keystone Species.”

To be honest, nothing makes me happier than when folks use Wikipedia to write about our beavers. Since our great friend Rickipedia is the one who wrote it, and he tells the story the exact same way I would. It’s a long column about cool things to do in Martinez and of course the peddler’s fair gets top billing, but never mind. It’s been a GRAND media week.

This morning I got an inquiry from the Martinez Tribune. Tribune? Apparently they saw a beaver near a wooden palate at Ward Street and wonder if we gave it to them to eat. (!) (Obviously they’re going to be another prescient media source in the metropolis.)  Here’s the Tribune’s fun photo which is on their Facebook page this morning.

palateFinally a big article in the National Wildlife Federation this week about the science involved in beaver chewing trees. This has caused a little debate in the beaver world and I was waiting until there were clearer answers from the author. But in the meantime, you might as well enjoy the icing on the cake of a beaverly week.

 Beavers: Masters of Downfall

Beavers-AS15-1.ashxHow do beavers fell trees in a preferred direction? A 10-year study reveals the answer.

For the past 10 years, I have come here every summer with my research team from the University of Arizona to study the beaver’s most iconic yet poorly understood behavior: tree felling. Studies have shown that more than 70 percent of all large felled trees crash in the direction of the water where a beaver’s lodge is located, which is to the animal’s advantage. But the question I hoped to answer was: How do beavers make the complex calculations required for such accuracy? After a decade of study, hundreds of tree measurements and thousands of hours of direct observations and camera recordings, we now know the answer.

In beavers’ work, just as in human logging, the directionality of a tree fall is produced by the “hinge”—uneven cuts on opposite sides of the trunk. A tree with a cut on just one side, no matter how wide, can collapse in any direction. But an additional small cut on the opposite side will make the fall strongly directional, with the direction depending on whether the second cut is above or below the initial cut. If it’s above the first cut, the tree will fall in the direction of the initial cut; if below, the tree will fall the opposite way.

 Making that second cut uneven in height to produce the hinge depends on changes in the beaver’s posture (sitting or standing) and the slope on which the tree is growing. On a tree that grows uphill from the water, for example, if a beaver starts cutting on the uphill side then simply circles the tree without changing its posture, it will produce a second cut below the first one—and a directional fall of the tree towards the water. Likewise, if the beaver starts its work on the downhill side of the tree and maintains its posture as it circles the tree, the tree will also fall toward the water.

We discovered that nearly all large trees in the area, especially those farther from water, had circular cuts of uneven heights and depths or directional hinges. In flat areas, beavers typically started their work on the side closest to water, gradually widening the cut over consecutive nights. Notably, as they circled the tree, they would rise on their hind legs, producing a second cut on the opposite side that was higher than the initial one. In just a few days, such trees would crash directly towards the water.

So beavers use directional cutting like loggers. Which surprises us not at all. But sparked a debate on whether trees fall towards the water naturally because they lean towards the open light. It seems to me that some trees don’t lean at all, and the research takes that into account in noting that they had directional cutting. Also that trees on the slope did NOT have it,  because they didn’t need it to fall towards the water. It’s an interesting article, you should go read the whole thing.

And if you want to JOIN the National Wildlife Federation and maybe sign up for a subscription to Ranger Rick, you can do that tomorrow because Beth Pratt of the California chapter will be exhibiting there.

You’re coming tomorrow, right?

Martinez Beaver Festival promo 2015 from Tensegrity Productions on Vimeo.

Join us Saturday, August 1st, 2015 for the 8th annual Martinez Beaver Festival!


Now THIS feels like a send-off! I got a call from the Gazette yesterday about the upcoming conference and a note from Leonard Houston (conference organizer) that they called them about it as well. When I called Greta back she was on the phone with (wait for it) APHIS. Go read Greta’s outstanding article!

Seems someone sent her the 2009 stats for the numbers of beaver killed in CA by the USDA. (I wonder where someone could have gotten that?) Anyway she was startled at the numbers, and more stunned when I told her that APHIS was a small fraction of the number of beavers killed each year.

APHIS told her predictably that ”Flow Devices Don’t Work” and she wants to know what’s going to change this! When are attitudes about beavers going to keep up with current research? Will the conference help? Does Martinez prove anything?  When is it going to be different?

I said…hmmm…have you ever seen an ocean liner try to do a U-turn? It takes a LONGGGGGGGGGGGG time. Change is coming in increments you can measure in nano tools. That’s what the conference is about. Do some flow devices fail? Absolutely. it depends on how skilled the installation is. If your plumber did heart surgery on you it might fail too, that doesn’t mean the technique itself is unsuccessful.

She did a bang-up job talking about the pragmatic benefits of beaver in today’s paper and wants to have a longer conversation about it when I come back.  I always love to get folk riled about beaver stats, and I’m sure I’ll come back brimming with things to talk about.

Then there’s this uplifting article from our friend Susan Kirks in Petaluma.

Busy Martinez Beavers – time for an update!

State of the Beaver Conference 2011 takes place in Canyonville, Oregon Feb. 2-4, and Heidi Perryman of Worth A Dam, the Martinez Beavers’ protectors, is a presenter. Heidi will speak about Urban Beavers and management in the urban setting. The Martinez Beavers are the beacon of hope for beaver protection – and appreciation – in a protected and managed habitat.

Go read the entire thing. Susan does such a graceful job outlying upcoming events that she even manages to plug the beaver festival! Thanks all for an excellent send off. I’ll try to post pictures of beaverly famous people soon wearing Worth A Dam t-shirts. In the mean time I’ll leave you in Lory Bruno’s capable hands until I get back or burst with gossip and have to sneak in and share. Be nice to your debut blogger! Make her love this job a lot so I can sneak a day off once in while!

Go Beavers! And don’t laugh about the music. I actually exchanged emails with Dr. Townsend about the possibility of sending a pep band to the conference. He liked the idea, but the timing was off. Still, maybe next year?





Did you see our nice article in the Gazette? Apparently beaver art is officially launched! Monday’s school board meeting will start with a short presentation on the mural by EBAG artists FRO and Randy. Hopefully we’ll generate more interest in the beavers – their impact on the habitat and the community. It’s a busy night. I can’t be there (day job!), Jon can’t be there because he has to do a “beaver tour” which someone bought at the silent auction. FRO and Randy will carry the night and Kathi will be there in her ‘school board capacity’. Worth A Dam is apparently in high demand at the moment.

Speaking of which I got a nice response from the columnist in the Missouri Bambi-myth article saying he was actually pro-beaver and ‘never lose your passion’ (!) and then a cordial letter from the trapper in question whom I had never written. He explained that they do use flow devices in public lands but offer only trapping on private property. He assured me that they offered information about wrapping trees and told people that trapping was a short term solution.  I’m not sure why writing an unknown woman who had never contacted him was a good use of his time, but there it is.

To tell the truth, the website has been getting a weird amount of traffic lately. I got an offer to host adds for pay and a threat for an international lawsuit for writing about a certain iconic-bra-appearing product. I did what I could to talk my way out of both for the time being. The really exciting news is that beaver-friend and Worth A Dam benefactor Scott Artis is going to begin an upgrade to the site Sunday. Site designer Michael Cronin taught me as much as he could before he moved away, but he never taught me how to do an upgrade. Now technology has moved forward without us and this website is like a tricycle on the freeway. Hopefully we’ll get new wheels soon. There may be moments of the look of the page changing but don’t worry, we’ll be excitingly upgraded and restored eventually!


So the Gazette has an editorial today in response to my letter. My letter isn’t printed, but the response, of course, is. It accuses Worth A Dam of being “Conspiracy Theorists” and then proceeds to describe the conspiratorial means by which we ply our conspiring trade. Apparently she got three letters in response to sundays column on the same day. It is of course impossible that any of our 500+ regular readers of this blog would have had their own reaction to the paper running the story after the election. Its not like people stopped me at the dam when I wrote about the historic photo or when they heard about it on the news and asked, “have you sent this to the Gazette? They should run something”.

Obviously, no one other than conspiracy theorists would think that the fact that it appeared on the blog on the 29th, and in the paper on the 9th, is confusing. Surely only JFK whackos could be dismayed by the final “Seeking Council” column on affordable housing appearing on election Tuesday, when it was slated for the Thursday before.

Still, I’m not sure how one person making a bad decision constitutes a conspiracy.

I don’t know why the story wasn’t run before the election. I know for a fact it was received, but it may have been mislaid, forgotten, or shuffled out of site. I know that I can do more to followup when I’m not siting 8 hours a day on bridge watch before going to work. Maybe it will never happen again, and its a complete accident that it happened now. I’d feel more reassured if my letter, (unfounded accusation that it was), or any of the mysterious trio, was printed along with the rebuttal.

In the meantime, we are told to expect a column Thursday on the bank stabilization project. Since the Gazette is reading this blog at the moment, (to find what offensive material they might need to react to next), allow me to suggest what will happen when you contact councilman Ross and the city manager. Ross’ response will likely be the same as for Bay City Media, in which he says the bank of Bertola’s was never  the concern. You may want to review the engineering reports to check if that’s true. I have highlighted the relevant passages here. If confronted that this is not what was said in court, the next excuse will be that this job was planned all along for that wall but the city ran out of money in 2000. To verify that you would have to get the city plans from the engineer, because to my knowledge no one’s ever seen them. Actually, I wouldn’t bother because the argument was never over whether this was planned for the wall, but whether it was an EMERGENCY that could affect downtown businesses if delayed. Finally, it would be useful to go back through the special assessment tax records and find out what the property owner paid in 1999 towards the flood project. I’m sure readers would like to know the Return On Investment he received.

Here’s some nice beaver followup in the meantime.

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!