Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Tag: Joyce Schnegg



Once upon a time there was a city in Canada where there were beavers building a dam in a creek behind some houses. The city was worried about property damage and there were some gloomy meetings. Meanwhile residents noticed the beavers dissappeared and when they called to find out what had happened to them the city reassured that they had been relocated to a greener pasture. Since residents had met them before and seen them in action, they were suspicious. They asked again and asked different people, did you relocate our beavers? Oh no, they were told, those beavers weren’t relocated, they were killed.

Let’s say that this story of cruelty and deception penetrated the Oshawan mind by osmosis and made them a little more sensitive to beaver issues in general. A few short months later some beavers were creating a flooding hazard in a similar area and the city once again decided to use the same solution that failed to work the last time. This season residents were proactive. They marched to the beavers defense, and earned media attention by doing lots of this:

They even got a few council members on their side who managed, in the wee hours, to get a ‘temporary stay’ on the decision and halt any more killing.

Do you remember that scene in Zeffirelli’s Romeo & Juliet where the servant races from Friar Lawrence on horse back with a letter to tell Romeo that Juliet is just PRETENDING to be dead and will be fine in a little while gets detained by some sheep crossing the road, while news from Baltahasar that she is forever lost makes its way to the forlorn lover? Well the Oshawa city council must have used the very same courier service, because the trapper was never informed of the “STAY” and went right on killing beavers.

Meanwhile, a fearless gentleman had snagged one of the crushing traps out of the water and was busily showing neighbors how dramatically it snapped shut. This was way too effective and very soon he had the ministry of the environment on his doorstep, citing him for removing their property, and demanding it back. The hero got more even press for Oshawa by taking the ridiculous case to court, while beaver supporters showed up at council meetings with stuffed beavers and plead for change.

Plagued by more bad press than any city council ever imagines, city officials could only threaten their residents with cost. Yes, we’ll do this humane thing you all say you want but it will be REALLY EXPENSIVE!!! Do you want that? It will cost 60,000 dollars. Are you still crazy about those beavers? We’re not made of money you know. Don’t come crying to us about pot holes or playgrounds. In the election that followed one candidate even staked his entire campaign on a pink beaver killing platform:

The people of Oshawa weren’t dissuaded. Spackman lost and Oshawa won.

Trapping a last resort in Oshawa’s new beaver policy

OSHAWA — A year after public outrage prompted Oshawa council to stop lethal trapping of beavers at Goodman Creek, the City has unveiled its new beaver management policy. It still includes the option of lethal trapping, but only as a last resort.  “We will do everything we can without going to that last stage,” said Garth Johns, the City’s interim commissioner of community services.

The new rules of beaver engagement for the city include wire wrapping of trees, beaver deceivers and beaver bafflers.  City staff monitors the area for new dams, tags trees for wrapping, and consults when needed. There is still a provision for dam removal and trapping when necessary, which will be less useful than the scrap of paper it took to write it down, but for the most part Ontario has done better than all of North America and Martinez combined, because they have a commitment to deal humanely not with just a single colony, but with every beaver that crosses their watery path.

And it all started with her:

Trapping a last resort in Oshawa's new beaver policy OSHAWA -- Joyce Schnegg stood with a beaver house behind her at Goodman Creek. She would like the beavers to be left alone as the area is supposed to be a "naturalized space". Originally shot October 21, 2009.

GREAT work, Oshawa. Are any of you thinking about a vacation in the Bay Area this summer? Maybe some wine tasting or a cable car ride? Something tells me you’dd be a hit at the Beaver Festival!


Do you remember the story last November about the city of Oshawa that said it was going to ‘relocate’ some beavers and the residents found out it was actually killing them? Six Furry Lies (To be fair, I guess death’s a kind of relocation…”the undiscovered country, from whose bourne no traveler returns…“) But it was a pretty bad lie, even as cities go, and there was a lot of red-faced finger-pointing from those who had made it, saying they hadn’t known the trapper was going to kill them.

(I am reminded of the old joke about the man who finds a tiger in his garden and is told by a neighbor to take it to the zoo. The next day the neighbor sees the same tiger in the yard and asks what happened. The man replies, ‘Of course I took it to the zoo like you suggested! We had such a great time that tomorrow I’m taking it to the aquarium!” Ba-dum-dum)

Back to our less charming story. At the time resident Joyce Schnegg had just found out that they hadn’t  killed ‘all’ the beavers and there were still four left. (Because even their cruelty is incompetent.) The mayor promised to bring in an expert to find solutions to the problem. The reporter of the story wrote me back and visited the website. It looked like there was going to be a kind of progress. “The arc of environmentalism is long but it bends towards beavers.

Turns out the ‘expert’ the city brought in was this company, Beacon Environmental, a regular hire of the city of Oshawa and especially dedicated to assessing things like bird hazards at airports. They cashed their check from the taxpayers of Oshawa and said there were three basic options: install a beaver baffler (cutting-edge beaver management when Reagan was president), move the beavers or kill them.

In a June 22 memo to the City, Beacon Environmental said there are three options for beaver management: using a “beaver baffle” — a device that regulates water levels in the pond while allowing beavers to remain — removing the beaver dam, or leaving the status quo. In its report, engineering firm Greck and Associates recommends removing the dam, saying it could “increase peak storm flows, increase downstream flood elevations and reduce storage and discharge capacities.”

A subsequent City report makes no mention of the beaver baffle, instead laying out three possibilities for removing the dam: live trapping and releasing the beavers, lethal trapping or repeatedly breaking apart the dam until the beavers get frustrated and leave. Beacon Environmental ecologist Brian Henshaw says lethal trapping is the most humane route if the City is set on removal.

“We don’t make that recommendation lightly,” he said. “But it’s not fair to move an animal to a place it doesn’t know, where it can’t set up a lodge and get a food store in place before November. That could result in death by starvation.”

Three choices. Guess which one the city picked?

So about 50 residents gathered on the corner to protest the decision to kill the beavers, including 2 council members. One advocated the use of a beaver deceiver (which the paper reported tricked the beavers into thinking the water flowed the opposite direction.) (!) and both shuddered at the traps brought by a resident from the dam to show how they worked. 50 people is a pretty nice number for a beaver protest. Check out their facebook page.

The two protesting council members were able to get actions slowed enough to manage a temporary ‘stay’ on the execution. There will be a ‘last chance ever -and I mean it this time’ meeting next week to discuss options. Clearly the mayor had 8 months to do something productive and used it to apply taxpayer money to find a firm that would say exactly  what he wanted to hear and take the blame. (See “Cal Engineering report on the wall behind the beaver lodge for an example)  I’m sure Martinez understands that civic decision well enough. Apparently, it’s just a language barrier. When Oshawa said last year that ‘the beavers were going to be relocated’ they didn’t mean they going to be alive when they were relocated, and when the mayor told the press they were looking for solutions they didn’t mean they actually wanted to solve the problem.

Drop a note to the Mayor and the Council so they know that there are options and lots of reasons to use them.

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!