Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!


The smith canal takes water from the San Joaquin river in to the interior of Stockton to feed Yosemite lake just south of the University of the Pacific.   It was originally created as a passage way for barge ships carrying or picking up agriculture to and from the region. It is now lined with homes and docks for pleasure boats. American legion park houses the old barge turn around point which is now called a ‘lake’ and lined with trees for recreation.

Gee, I wonder if anyone we know is enjoying those trees.

Fitzgerald: A modest proposal for smith canal

Beaver or beavers unknown are gnawing down trees around the lake in American Legion Park.

Mark Farnsworth, who with wife Liz spotted unmistakable beaver chew marks while walking their dog, said he believes the beavers are not building a dam but a lodge.

“These guys don’t have a stream to block,” opined Farnsworth. “They’ll build a den down lower.”

Beavers build DIY dams on streams to surround their mud-and-wood lodges with a pond as protection from predators. They also eat underbark. The North American Beaver used to be so prevalent around Stockton that city founder Charles Weber nicknamed Stockton “Castoria,” after the beaver’s Latin name, Castor Canadensis.

“We’re unaware of that issue happening,” stated Offi

cer Joseph Silva, spokesman for the Stockton Police Department, which includes the Animal Services Division.

Silva added, “Our Animal Control officers are only equipped to deal with domesticated animals.”

As fate would have it, there’s a long-running controversy over a flood control gate proposed for nearby Smith Canal, which feeds the lake. Perhaps, instead of spending millions, flood control officials should just step back let nature take its course.

Hmm. Isn’t that a very interesting column? Mr. Fitzgerald thank you! Although being in Stockton which depends so dearly on its levees, the odds of these or any beaver being allowed to do their work is zero percent. If once upon a time the area was so full of beavers it was nearly called “Castoria”, that is because it was so full of marshy water and reeds there was little space to build anything at all. The creation of levees divided up the town into actual land and actual water, and the area guards those levees with its very life – for a good reason. Their great worry is that a beaver or muskrat wikl burrow into a bank, weaken the levee and send the whole place underwater. They spend considerable time and money every year trapping out whatever threats they can find.

Which is why I like this article so much. If there’s one thing folks from Stockton hate more than beavers, its wasting their hard-earned money.  Telling them they could save some by letting these beavers live will likely lead to some interesting head-scratching.


Last night was an awesome beaver advocacy battery recharge. The raviolis were delicious, the company was lively, and the wine was free-flowing. To start the evening everyone took a little field-trip to Susana Park to see the site of the new festival next year. There was much delight to imagine where tents and trailers could go and how the park would look with a giant chalk beaver pond in the middle.

There are a precious few things that make you feel like the beaver decade is starting out on the right foot – er paw. But this was definitely one of them. 


 


The first week of 2018 wasn’t so bad, was it? This morning there is a big profile on a plucky young beaver trapper cluttering up my mailbox, but I don’t have the strength of character to tackle that much podsnappery this early in the year. (And yes that IS a word that I just learned, and I love it very much, thank you.) So if we can’t talk about an article that glorifies trappers, lets do the opposite instead.

Calls for state-sponsored trapping and removal of beaver family in the north to stop

Angry campaigners have called for a state-sponsored trapping and removal of a beaver family in the Highlands to stop.

 Three beavers died in the first phase of the controversial Scottish Natural Heritage operation, which was ordered by Environment Secretary Roseanna Cunningham last year. And now, Labour MSP David Stewart is backing conservation charity Trees For Life in its calls for a consultation before any further trapping takes place near Beauly.

Mr Stewart said: “It is concerning that the organisation has written three times to Ms Cunningham since she announced her decision to trap the beaver family but the Secretary has not replied,” explained Mr Stewart. “Strathglass appears to be completely different to Tayside in that the beavers have never caused any difficulties for land managers and most of the community has been unaware of their presence.

“I believe the Scottish Government needs to listen to local views on this issue and I back the call for a full consultation with the community before there is any action to capture the remaining beavers. I would hate to see more beavers dying after being trapped.

Alan McDonnell, Trees for Life Conservation Manager, explained: ‘We simply don’t understand why the Secretary is in such a rush to take these beavers from the wild without even considering other options or listening to what local people think.” Alice Clifford, Strathglass landowner added: “The beavers have been here for years now, but they haven’t caused anyone any problems – in fact most people didn’t even know they existed.

“The trapping has been a complete overreaction from the Government and a lot of people here are very upset that it has led to beavers dying in captivity.” Trees for Life was studying Strathglass when workers discovered a beaver family in June last year on the River Beauly with two generations of young and the breeding pair had clearly been active for nearly three years.

Did you hear that? Stop trapping our beavers! And let people weigh in on the decisions you make from hear on in. I like the way that sounds.  The government has its priorities mixed up. If you want to raise your picket fence by a foot you have to apply for a variance by posting signs and writing every one of your neighbors of your plan. But if you want to kill the only beavers in the county – or the country – that’s just fine.

In California we have so little influence on who gets to trap beavers. My annual PRA request for beaver depredation permits is required by law to happen in 90 days. At day 100 they wrote me this

???

I wrote back with polite incredulity and said are you saying that zero beavers in california have been depredated? Or that you no longer keep track of the ones that are? And if this represents a policy shift please send me the statute so I’m aware of it.

Which prompted an immediate phone call from too-cheerful CDFG attorney saying “OHHHH those records! We didn’t understand! The request went to the wrong place. We’ll take care of it now!”

Meanwhile its day 133 since my request and I’m still waiting.


Tonight is the annual beaver guardians ravioli feed, so you’ll understand if I have to dash this morning and straighten the curtains, count the silverware, or refrigerate the champagne. Our tiny living room is now filled with a table set for 12 and we sat in folding chairs last night. These great folks are coming of course, sadly, minus one. and joyfully plus 2. There are so many more that should be there, but you would need a can-opener to fit one more body in our shabby victorian, so they will have to wait.

We finished dipping the beaver tails in chocolate yesterday, and 300 raviolis are made and at the ready so we’re ready for show time! Wish us and beavers luck.

New Years Ravioli Feast-18

You know the idea that’s been building in my mine, is wouldn’t it be GREAT if we could incentivize keeping beavers on the landscape by rewarding land-owners with some kind of payment for letting them perform their ecosystem services. PES we could call it?

Apparently this Forbes was thinking the exact same thing.

Cattle Ranchers Join Conservationists To Save Endangered Species And Rangelands

Idaho rancher Jerry Hoagland likes working under the open sky. He’s seen all kinds of wildlife, from elk and coyotes to eagles and mountain lions. But he had never heard of the endangered Columbia spotted frog before it was discovered on his ranch.

This wasn’t exactly welcome news, since it brought up fears that an environmental lawsuit might derail his ranch operations. “It was the worry a lot of us had at one point, that you didn’t have any control over your own property,” he said.

Enter Idaho’s division of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Hoagland learned that the wildlife agency was willing to split the cost of creating ponds and wetlands on private ranches to support the spotted frog and other endangered species. With shallow edges for spawning and deeper water for hiding, the ponds would serve as virtual incubators for biodiversity.

Did you get that? If you create a man-made pond on your land Idaho Fish and Game will give you $$$ for improving biodiversity. And that’s if you do it yourself, which takes time and money. I’m thinking of a little animal that would do that for free.

Hoagland says several years ago, he dug about 20 ponds (“including some dried-up old beaver ponds”) on his land at upper Reynolds Creek for the Columbia spotted frog. In a documentary commissioned by the , the Owyhee County rancher reports the spotted frog population was growing steadily. “A beaver turned four small ponds into one large pond, which was absolutely amazing,” he said. “We counted over 120 juveniles and I don’t know how many adults in that pond. We’re finding more frogs, and we’ll probably help keep it off the (endangered species) list.”

You see what I mean? If I can just get people to stop killing beavers, they will make their own arguments all by themselves.

“I wanted to create the [wet] meadow habitat because water is so scarce in the West, and water is critical to life,” says rancher Chris Black of Owyhee County, who created a series of ponds on his property. “If I can create a meadow habitat, I can create a place for sage grouse to come in, pronghorn to come in, all wildlife to use, plus my cows have a habitat they can use. It’s good for everything in the system.”

Cattle ranching is a historic way of life in the West, but it’s under siege, threatened by development, drought, wildfires, a shrinking number of cattle buyers and razor-thin profit margins. But land trusts, conservation easements and payments for ecosystem services (such as wetlands) offer hope that rangelands and their wildlife can survive and even flourish.

How does this work? Some conservation agencies, like Idaho’s, offer cost-sharing with ranchers, while other Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) cover all the costs or pay ranchers directly for wildlife programs. Ranchers who set land aside in permanent conservation easements receive estate benefits and federal tax savings for up to 15 years. And some land trusts, such as the Ranchland Trust of Kansas, allow ranchers to specify that their grassland legacy continue to be ranched.

Okay, I agree. There are all kinds of problems with this cattle-worshiping article. Ranching depletes water and Mary Obrien wrote that “This piece contains a lot of inaccuracies about ranching — never mind that there is no pound of meat that requires more water; uses and degrades more arid and semi-arid public land; and emits more methane than cattle.”

BUT, laying aside the problems, and considering the fact that Fish and Game already use the policy and funding is already in place, they have the paperwork, and already work with the system my point is that it wouldn’t take TOO much work to broaden it to include having beaver ponds on your land. Right? I mean of course a rancher can’t promise they’ll be there for 15 years but you can promise not to trap them and report the number of dams on your land.

And the very IDEA of paying for ecosystem services should be repeated over and over. Why not let any land owner do the same, or a university, or even a city who keeps beaver on its urban creek receive PES?

This whole article has me thinking. Plus it gives me an excuse to post my very favorite video of 2017 again, and I never, NEVER tire of beaver Moses.


There are plenty of folks whounderstand the importance of beavers at both ends of the United States. And not nearly enough in the middle.  Flyover country, as its called, doesn’t take kindly to beavers. So you can imagine how pleased I am about these two entries. The first is from Ohio and the second from just across the great lakes in Milwakee.

Ohio beavers

When I was a young fella and still living in Maine, one of the greatest things you could run across in the wild was a beaver dam. Most of the streams and brooks in my area held populations of wild brook trout. A beaver dam on a trout brook meant one thing to me. Bigger trout!

The dam usually backed up enough water to form at least a small pond, or in some cases, a very large pond or backwater. After a couple of years, these ponds let the brook trout population grow to larger sizes than in the shallow, narrower brooks. Their still waters let large populations of insects flourish and provide the trout with more than an adequate diet.

I have seen ancient beaver dams that were over a quarter of a mile in length and higher than 10 feet in places. However, a beaver dam of any size on a trout brook was a welcome sight. Normally, in most Maine trout brooks, the trout average about seven or eight inches in length with occasional ones over 10 inches.

Brook trout have to be one of the tastiest fish ever to have swum in an icy cold brook regardless of its size. In fact, after attaining a length of a foot or more, they don’t seem to taste as good. Don’t get me wrong — they are still at the top of my list of food fish no matter their length. There are no wild brook trout out here in Ohio, at least, not to my knowledge. If there were, I guarantee that Ohio’s attitude toward the beaver and its dams would change in a hurry!

My experience out here with beavers is limited. All I know is that there is a population of them at Lake Logan. However, from what I have been able to ascertain with my own eyes, any laws and regulations pertaining to beaver here in the hills are totally ignored and/or not enforced. Every time I have seen a beaver dam in this area, in very short order, it disappears. I have seen, and photographed, several beavers that had been shot and killed at the lake.

Foxholes make strange bedfellows. There are precious few folks in Ohio that care about beavers. So I’m going to be happy about this columnist who appreciates them because the trout get bigger in their ponds. (And everything else, too, by the way). Of course he doesn’t realize that beavers don’t dam large rivers because they don’t need to. And since there’s no dam there’s nothing to draw attention to their presence and get them killed.

They aren’t different beavers. They are the beavers that happen to survive.

Obviously the distinction between beavers that build dams and beavers that don’t build dams is a mysterious one for lots of people. The truth is there isn’t much mystery at all. Beavers build dams when they need to create deep water to protect their offspring. If there is ALREADY deep water there is no need to  do it.  That is all. Researchers have plucked beavers from deep streams (where they maintained zero dams) and swooped them upstream to little streams where dams were necessary. Then sat back to observe them BUILDING DAMS 0stemsibly for the first time.

It’s instinct, baby.

(Although instinct that is honed with practice I’ll say. Because we saw our beavers get better at building over time, and we saw that there were skilled beavers and stupid beavers in our 10 years of field research here in Martinez. Dad and Reed were the best dam builders of all 30 beavers. But everyone tried.) Even beavers in rehab ‘try’, With newspapers or towels or whatever they have on hand – er tooth;<You will see this confusion pops up in this nice film from Milwakee as well, when the woman from the urban ecology center remarks that ‘they don’t have the dam-building beavers’ there. They’re the same dam beavers!  We will cut her slack. It’s a nice film and an easy mistake when you’ve haven’t had local beavers in 120 years.

I’m also very fond of the landowner whose so happy to have them back on his property.

This nice image comes from the Getty museum. I love everything about it but I can’t figure out why it’s shown cut in cubes. Can you?


I feel it’s time to read another article that’s really about our beavers without realizing it. Maybe this time from Yale. Are you ready?

Habitat on the Edges: Making Room for Wildlife in an Urbanized World

Efforts to protect biodiversity are now focusing less on preserving pristine areas and more on finding room for wildlife on the margins of human development. As urban areas keep expanding, it is increasingly the only way to allow species to survive.

For conservationists, protecting biodiversity has in recent years become much less about securing new protected areas in pristine habitat and more about making room for wildlife on the margins of our own urbanized existence. Conservation now often means modifying human landscapes to do double-duty as wildlife habitat — or, more accurately, to continue functioning for wildlife even as humans colonize them for their homes, highways, and farms. There is simply no place else for animals to live.

Corridor protection on the grand scale has achieved remarkable results, notably with the 2,000-mile long Yellowstone-to-Yukon Conservation Initiative. It aims to connect protected areas and to ensure safe passage for elk, grizzly bears, and other wildlife across 500,000 square miles of largely shared habitat, both public and privately owned. At the same time, research by Nick Haddad, a conservation biologist at the University of Michigan’s W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, has demonstrated substantial improvements in biodiversity from corridors as little as 25 yards in width, well within the range, he says, of “what’s reasonable in urban landscapes.”  Indeed, a new study from northern Botswana has found that elephants traveling from Chobe National Park to the nearby Chobe River will use corridors as small as 10 feet wide to traverse newly urbanized areas.

Even in the absence of new parks and other habitat, city residents have rallied to their wildlife, sometimes in extraordinary fashion. In Mumbai, development-oriented politicians continue to encourage the destruction of natural habitat, particularly in the Aarey Milk Colony neighborhood abutting the city’s Sanjay Gandhi National Park.  But local conservationists, together with the park itself, have launched a pioneering campaign to help densely populated neighborhoods around the park cope with more than 30 free-ranging leopards in their midst. Likewise, Los Angeles has turned its mountain lions into urban folk heroes. (The Facebook bio of the lion known as P22 begins: “Hi! I’m LA’s loneliest bachelor. I like to hang out under the Hollywood sign to try and pick up cougars. Likes: Deer, catnip, Los Feliz weekends. Dislikes: Traffic, coyotes, P-45.”)

But caution about the potential of our cities and suburbs as wildlife habitat is probably still a good idea. One danger is that these landscapes may become “ecological sinks” — that is, places where excess individuals from undisturbed habitat can survive, but not ultimately increase. Having straw-headed bulbuls in central Singapore does not, for instance, ensure survival of the species. Success with some more visible species may also blind us to broader but less obvious declines in other species. European rewilding, for instance, has not been rewilding for its insect population.

Hmm, isn’t that a GREAT article about our beavers that never mentions them once? I told you so. Again, I’m no scientist but if I was looking for one single species to tolerate on the urban landscape that gave the most bang for your buck – you know, biodiversity, focal species, social cohesion – I’d pick beaver. Their little urban dams would   take that urban corridor you call a creek and elevate it to the next level with birds, fish and otters. Doesn’t that seem like a great investment for any city to make?

BEAVER FESTIVAL XVI

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Story By Year