The New York Times Review of books offers this image of the burden of choice through the eyes of a beaver walking down an aisle of willow. The bountiful illustration made me laugh aloud and I was happy to see it on the page. Of course, we should be clear, beavers wouldn’t suffer from any internal debate over which tree to take. They’d take all the ones they wanted and leave all the ones they didn’t. They are much more direct and unburdened that way…
Choosing
Search Past Stories
BAY AREA PODCAST
Educate & Engage
The meeting that started it all
Beaver Sites
- Animal Protection of New Mexico
- Beaver Ambassadors
- Beaver Deceivers, LLC
- Beaver Insights
- Beaver Institute
- Beaver Solutions
- Beaver State Wildlife Solutions
- Beaver Trust
- Beaver Trust
- Beavers & Brush
- Beavers Matter
- Beavers Northwest
- Beavers Wetlands & Wildlife
- Bob Arnebeck’s Beavers
- Bring Back Beaver – OAEC
- CA Working Beaver Group
- Corvalis Beaver Strike Team
- De Rios y Castores
- Ecosystem Engineers
- Fairfield Beavers
- Fox Creek Oregon
- Grand Canyon Trust
- Human – Beaver Coexistence Fund
- Iowa Water Project
- Methow Beaver Project
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research – Beavers
- Partnering with Beaver: Utah
- River Otter Beavers
- Romance of the Beaver
- Scottish Wild Beavers
- Seventh Generation Institute
- Sierra Wildlife Coalition
- Southland Beaver
- Stittsville Beaver Lodge
- Superior BioConservancy
- Taylor Creek Beavers
- The Feasibility and Acceptability of Reintroducing European Beaver in England
- The Fretful Porcupine
- The Lands Council
- Unexpected Wildlife Refuge
- Watershed Guardians