Because the beaver isn't just an animal; it's an ecosystem!

Category: Uncategorized


“What happens when they (the beavers) move on, will there still be a Beaver Festival?” is the question before the court of public opinion. The answer is decidedly yes!

The shortsightedness of this comment only serves as a glaring reminder of the inability by a select few to catch the vision that what began here in Martinez has already breached our borders. Safeguarding our beaver colony is merely a start. Worth A Dam’s attention has thus far been trained with laser like focus on our situation here in Martinez, however, we recognized early on that our ultimate destination is Sacramento and beyond.

There is a growing body of evidence in support of fostering the natural ecosystems created by beavers. A fifty four year study of beavers and the wetlands they create, complied by the University of Alberta, clearly demonstrates the value of beaver ponds in mitigating the effects of drought.

Excerpted from a press release issued February 20, 2008 by the University of Alberta:

“Removal of beaver should be considered an environmental disturbance on par with in-filling, peat mining and industrial water extraction,” said researcher Glynnis Hood, lead author on the study and an assistant professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of Alberta’s Augustana Campus in Camrose, Canada.

In examining how beaver influenced some of Alberta’s wetlands in Elk Island National Park over a 54-year period, Hood and her co-investigator, Professor Suzanne Bayley, discovered that the presence of beaver and their dams increased by up to nine times, the presence of open water.

Climate models predict the incidence of drought in parts of North America will increase in frequency and length over the next 100 years, and beaver will likely play an important role in maintaining open water and mitigating the impact, Hood said. The infilling and drainage of wetlands has increased to make way for urban and industrial expansion, and beaver colonies are being removed both inside and outside of protected areas, which means a continued loss of water resources, Hood noted.

“In times of drought they may be one of the most effective ways to mitigate wetland loss,” said Hood. “Some people believe climate is driving everything, but the presence of beaver has a dramatic effect on the availability of open water in an area. Beaver are helping to keep water in areas that would otherwise be dry.” Even during drought, where beaver were present, there was 60 per cent more open water than those same areas during previous drought periods when beaver were absent.

The 2007 fire season saw a combined loss of .5m acres in California alone. While it’s true much of the lost acreage was a result of criminal activity, it is also true that drought like conditions fanned the flames.

California on the whole has lost most of its original wetlands; some estimate that loss at nearly ninety one percent. There has been an ongoing water war that has threatened to tear California asunder for years. What would it mean for our state if we were able to restore just fifty percent of our lost wetlands? How many acres annually consumed by wildfires might be spared? How much money in terms of tax dollars is needed to correct the problems we’ve created?

When will people open their eyes to the fact that when ecosystems collapse we all feel the effects, remember this year’s salmon season?

To some they are just beavers, in reality they are the harbingers of all our future; which is why we will celebrate them today and for many years to come.

See you this afternoon!

Linda Meza


Phil Price, who does the excellent bay area bird blog, was kind enough to do a generous piece on the beaver festival this morning. (Okay, he’s not actually a stranger, since he’s sent benevolent readers our way before and we have been in contact, but I don’t think we’ve ever actually met.) He suggests coming to the event and staying for dinner, mentioning the beavers as your destination pointedly to the business owners. He recommends arriving by Amtrak and sitting to watch the beautiful scenery before being delivered right to the festival park. What a great idea! I agree whole-heartedly. Thanks Phil, and if you make it out here we’ll be sure to point out all our new feathered residents at the dam, including the osprey on the hills whose loud chirp you can hear from the waters edge.

Last night we put together the final touches of display at the event, and I thought i’d give you the preview.

Expect to see information about creeks, animals, birds, and of course beavers as well as a prominent native american display. You can even pick up tickets for that night to Sacajawea at the booth, and still have plenty of time to see the beavers come out. Our two musical centerpieces include Andrew Mason, the singer who will be forever membered for singing “don’t kill them beavers” all over the news, and later the Alhambra Valley Band will entertain us with much deserved local bluegrass.

When I mentioned the design your own tail contest to a family at the farmer’s market, their little girl’s eyes widened with ambition. “Can people start NOW?” She wanted to know, full of ideas. Speaking of starting now, you might be thinking bout what you’d like to say to the mayor about the Martinez Beavers and get ready for your moment on the historic video letter. There are numerous beaver-related prizes and some fancy new raffle tickets that could bring good luck your way.

It should be a dam good time!


About 100 miles west of London they are celebrating their first new kits in four centuries. Beavers were hunted to extinction in England as early as the 16th century. The animals were reintroduced – not by conservationists – but by property developers! This is the first time these beaver pioneers have produced a litter. Twelve new kits now grace the english soil, and their arrival is stirring up alot of interest.

An environmental-minded property developer introduced three pairs in 2005 to Flagham Fen Lake, and has been keeping an eye on their progress. He feels strongly that beavers are an asset to the area and the habitat. His luxurious eco-estates have been pursued by the deep pockets of Brad Pitt and others. For a lovely breath of fresh read the articles and think about how nice it is to hear property developers talk about endangered species, wetlands “engineers” and kits learning to hold their breath.

I especially like the emphasis on beavers as being good for the environment and pocketbook. That’s news we can use.


The Alhambra Creek scraping/dredging project is on the the Agenda for the City Council Meeting, so it would be good to have warm beaver-supporting bodies on hand. The project is slated for the area next to the secondary dam, and there has been some concern that it might lead to dam removal, water loss and food reduction for our beavers. Councilman Mark Ross and new city Manager Philip Vince say that the work can be done without damaging the structure and preserving a portion of the tulles for the beavers to feed. They need us on hand to remind them all why it SHOULD be done.

The beavers use the secondary dam as a terrace feeding area. They’re enjoying tulle, fennel and willow from the area. This is giving a chance for our upstream trees to recover and increasing their visibility as they go beyond the three bridge viewing area. There has been some speculation as to whether they’re building a third dam farther downstream, but this appears to be an ungrounded, floating raft of debris, and not a dam. Beavers build dams from the bottom up, and not the top down.

Come to the meeting and support this important section of our beavers’ habitat. The dredging project has been on the planning calendar for a long time and is good for the overall health of our creek. There is no reason we can’t take care of our creek AND our beavers.

The punchline? Guess what’s really good at stopping silt from going downstream and clogging up marinas in the first place? Yup. Beaver Dams.


It occurred to me that it may be ironic for the mayor to express concerns about willow trees impeding the creek flow, but not mention the dead body found in the creek the day before. I imagine a body would interfere with flow as well. Worth A Dam’s trees were subjected to gravest scrutiny, but the body of a woman was left long enough to decompose. It seems in heartless poor taste to even mention the disparity, but it can’t be ignored. The city’s has minimal interest in the creek: I noticed this when I was thinking of the planting and realized there were no gates to get onto the banks. I understand the city wants to keep people out, but a locked gate is really just like a fence that sometimes opens. They could have planned ahead.

Jake Jacobsen of Snohomish County in Washington is the Watershed Steward for his region and has been helpful to us with all sorts of questions. He knows the creeks inside and out, and helps property owners with riparian and beaver management. Steward positions are under the public works department, and the county pays him to know the waterways.

What would it be like if Martinez had an Alhambra Creek Steward?

A steward could walk the creek regularly and notice anomalies in the stream bed. They could map the location of trees and let staff know if any is a problem. They could find the baby alligator a boy just told Moses he released because he couldn’t keep him anymore as a pet. They could notice where homeless encampents were located, and figure out which houses were dumping christmas trees into the water. They could identify and remove invasive species like the Arundo growing on the lodge. They could test BMI and water quality to find any healthy or unhealthy sections of the river, and they could spot the occasional dead body.

The concern that our trees, planted on the bank in accord with the city plan and in cooperation with the city engineer will impede flow, is pure theatrics. Exaggerated attention is directed to the beaver portion of the creek, and people who never glanced in its direction before are watching with hawk’s eyes to find proof that the beavers are bad news. The kindest interpretation of this is that people see things in a new way when they are alarmed. There are several less charitable explanations.

An example: At my old office I had birdfeeders and a number of feathered visitors. Goldfinches, white and red breasted nuthatches, and downy woodpeckers to name a few. My downstairs neighbor complained about seed husks so we would sweep his porch every week to keep it tidy. During one such sweeping event, the crabby old accountant watched with folded arms and said, “What about all the green stuff. Get that too.”

The “green stuff” in question was pollen from the hundreds of digger pines in the area and had been on his porch every spring for as long as he had been there, but of course he had never seen it before because he had never looked with this particular set of eyes.

These are the type of eyes directed to downtown’s portion of Alhambra Creek right now. Every piece of trash is noticed, every newly planted tree is a possible hazard. This exaggerate concern could be used to fuel major improvements and developments. There could be pipe weed to attract butterflies and wildflowers to brighten the waterway and benches to stop and appreciate the habitat. There could be a creek walk and signs to direct visitors to different features, like the kingfisher nest recently noticed at the primary dam.

But there won’t be. The only opportunity being seized here is the opportunity to disparage the beavers and the people who advocate for them.

Martinez does not “steward” its watershed: it exploits it.

DONATE

TREE PROTECTION

BAY AREA PODCAST

Our story told around the county

Beaver Interactive: Click to view

LASSIE INVENTS BDA

URBAN BEAVERS

LASSIE AND BEAVERS

Ten Years

The Beaver Cheat Sheet

Restoration

RANGER RICK

Ranger rick

The meeting that started it all

Past Reports

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Story By Year

close

Share the beaver gospel!